A “new” proposal by the Biden administration to create a health-focused federal company modeled after DARPA shouldn’t be what it seems to be. Promoted as a approach to “end cancer,” this resuscitated “health DARPA” conceals a harmful agenda.
[April 28, 2020], President Biden was extensively praised in mainstream and health-care–focused media for his name to create a “new biomedical research agency” modeled after the U.S. army’s “high-risk, high-reward” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA. As touted by the president, the company would search to develop “innovative” and “breakthrough” therapies for most cancers, Alzheimer’s illness and diabetes, with a name to “end cancer as we know it.”
Far from “ending cancer” in the best way most Americans may envision it, the proposed company would merge “national security” with “health security” in such a means as to make use of each bodily and psychological well being “warning signs” to stop outbreaks of illness or violence earlier than they happen. Such a system is a recipe for a technocratic “pre-crime” group with the potential to criminalize each psychological and bodily sickness in addition to “wrongthink.”
The Biden administration has requested Congress for $6.5 billion to fund the company, which might be largely guided by Biden’s just lately confirmed high science adviser, Eric Lander.
Lander, previously the pinnacle of the Silicon Valley-dominated Broad Institute, has been controversial for his ties to eugenicist and little one intercourse trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his comparatively latest reward for James Watson, an overtly racist eugenicist. Despite that, Lander is ready to be confirmed by the Senate and Congress and is reportedly considerably enthusiastic concerning the proposed new “health DARPA.”
This new company, set to be known as ARPA-H or HARPA, can be housed throughout the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and would elevate the NIH finances to over $51 billion. Unlike different businesses at NIH, ARPA-H would differ in that the initiatives it funds would not be peer reviewed previous to approval; as a substitute, hand-picked program managers would make all funding selections. Funding would additionally take the type of milestone-driven funds as a substitute of the extra conventional multiyear grants.
ARPA-H will possible closely fund and promote mRNA vaccines as one of many “breakthroughs” that may remedy most cancers. Some of the mRNA vaccine producers which have produced among the most generally used COVID-19 vaccines, such because the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, stated just last month that “cancer is the next problem to tackle with mRNA tech” post-COVID.
BioNTech has been developing mRNA gene therapies for most cancers for years and is collaborating with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to create mRNA-based therapies for tuberculosis and HIV. Other “innovative” applied sciences that can be a focus of this company are much less well-known to the general public and arguably extra regarding.
- The Long Road to ARPA-H
- A Plan to Merge Biology, Engineering and Computer Science
- Silicon Valley, the Military and the Wearable ‘Revolution’
- Government and Public and Private Agencies Team Up
- The Era of Digital Dictatorships Is Nearly Here
- Insurance Companies Push for ‘Fitness’ Wearables
- A Plan to Record, Mark and Manipulate Your Brain
The Long Road to ARPA-H
ARPA-H shouldn’t be a new and unique Biden administration thought; there was a earlier try and create a “health DARPA” through the Trump administration in late 2019. Biden started to advertise the thought throughout his presidential marketing campaign as early as June 2019, albeit utilizing a very totally different justification for the company than what had been pitched by its advocates to Trump.
In 2019, the identical basis and people at the moment backing Biden’s ARPA-H had urged then-President Trump to create “HARPA,” not for the principle function of researching therapies for most cancers and Alzheimer’s, however to cease mass shootings earlier than they occur via the monitoring of Americans for “neuropsychiatric” warning indicators.
For the previous few years, one man has been the driving force behind HARPA — former vice chair of General Electric and former president of NBCUniversal, Robert Wright. Through the Suzanne Wright Foundation (named for his late spouse), Wright has spent years lobbying for an company that “would develop biomedical capabilities — detection tools, treatments, medical devices, cures, etc. — for the millions of Americans who are not benefiting from the current system.”
While he, like Biden, has cloaked the company’s precise function by claiming it will likely be primarily targeted on treating most cancers, Wright’s 2019 proposal to his private pal Donald Trump revealed its underlying ambitions.
As first proposed by Wright in 2019, the flagship program of HARPA can be SAFE HOME, brief for Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by Helping Overcome Mental Extremes.
SAFE HOME would suck up lots of personal information from “Apple Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo, and Google Home” and different shopper digital units, in addition to information from well being care suppliers to find out if a person may be more likely to commit a crime. The information can be analyzed by synthetic intelligence (AI) algorithms “for early diagnosis of neuropsychiatric violence.”
The Department of Justice’s pre-crime approach known as DEEP was activated simply months earlier than Trump left workplace; it was additionally justified as a approach to “stop mass shootings before they happen.” Soon after Biden’s inauguration, the brand new administration started utilizing information from social media to make pre-crime arrests as a part of its method towards combating “domestic terror.”
Given the historical past of Silicon Valley firms collaborating with the federal government on matters of warrantless surveillance, it seems that points of SAFE HOME could already be covertly lively below Biden, solely ready for the formalization of ARPA-H/HARPA to be legitimized as public coverage.
The national-security purposes of Robert Wright’s HARPA are additionally illustrated by the person who was its lead scientific adviser — former head of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office Geoffrey Ling. Not solely is Ling the principle scientific adviser of HARPA, however the original proposal by Wright would have Ling each personally design HARPA and lead it as soon as it was established.
A Plan to Merge Biology, Engineering and Computer Science
Ling’s work at DARPA will be summarized by BTO’s acknowledged mission, which is to work towards merging “biology, engineering and computer science to harness the power of natural systems for national security.” BTO-favored applied sciences are additionally poised to be the mainstays of HARPA, which plans to specifically use “advancements in biotechnology, supercomputing, big data and artificial intelligence” to perform its targets.
The direct DARPA connection to HARPA underscores that the agenda behind this coming company dates again to the failed Bio-Surveillance mission of DARPA’s Total Information Awareness program, which was launched after the occasions of September 11, 2001.
TIA’s Bio-Surveillance project sought to develop the “necessary information technologies and resulting prototype capable of detecting the covert release of a biological pathogen automatically, and significantly earlier than traditional approaches,” engaging in this “by monitoring nontraditional data sources” together with “prediagnostic medical data” and “behavioral indicators.”
While nominally targeted on “bioterrorist attacks,” TIA’s Bio-Surveillance mission additionally sought to amass early detection capabilities for “normal” illness outbreaks. Bio-Surveillance and associated DARPA initiatives on the time, resembling LifeLog, sought to reap information via the mass use of some form of wearable or handheld know-how.
These DARPA packages have been finally shut down as a result of controversy over claims they’d be used to profile home dissidents and get rid of privateness for all Americans within the US.
That DARPA’s previous whole surveillance dragnet is coming again to life below a supposedly separate health-focused company, and one which emulates its organizational mannequin no much less, confirms that many TIA-related packages have been merely distanced from the Department of Defense when formally shut down.
By separating the army from the general public picture of such applied sciences and packages, it made them extra palatable to the lots, regardless of the army remaining closely concerned behind the scenes.
As Unlimited Hangout has just lately reported, main points of TIA have been merely privatized, giving rise to firms resembling Facebook and Palantir, which resulted in such DARPA initiatives being extensively used and accepted. Now, below the guise of the proposed ARPA-H, DARPA’s authentic TIA would basically be making a comeback for all intents and functions as its personal spin-off.
Silicon Valley, the Military and the Wearable ‘Revolution’
This most up-to-date effort to create ARPA-H/HARPA combines properly with the coordinated push of Silicon Valley firms into the sphere of well being care, particularly Silicon Valley firms that double as contractors to U.S. intelligence and/or the army (e.g., Microsoft, Google and Amazon).
During the COVID-19 disaster, this development towards Silicon Valley dominance of the health-care sector has accelerated significantly on account of a top-down push towards digitalization with telemedicine, distant monitoring and the like.
One attention-grabbing instance is Amazon, which launched a wearable final 12 months that purports to not solely use biometrics to watch individuals’s bodily well being and health, however to trace their emotional state as properly. The earlier 12 months, Amazon acquired the online pharmacy PillPack, and it’s not onerous to think about a situation by which information from Amazon’s Halo wellness band is used to supply therapy suggestions which are then equipped by Amazon-owned PillPack.
Companies resembling Amazon, Palantir and Google are set to be intimately concerned in ARPA-H’s actions. In explicit, Google, which launched numerous health-tech initiatives in 2020, is ready to have a main position on this new company on account of its long-standing ties to the Obama administration when Biden was vp and to President Biden’s high science adviser, Eric Lander.
As talked about, Lander is poised to play a main position in ARPA-H/HARPA if and when it materializes. Before turning into the highest scientist within the nation, Lander was president and founding director of the Broad Institute.
While marketed as a partnership between MIT and Harvard, the Broad Institute is heavily influenced by Silicon Valley, with two former Google executives on its board, a companion of Silicon Valley enterprise capital agency Greylock Partners, and the previous CEO of IBM, in addition to a few of its top endowments coming from outstanding tech executives.
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who was intimately involved with Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign and who’s near the Democratic Party generally, chairs the Broad Institute as of this April . In March 2021, Schmidt gave the institute $150 million to “connect biology and machine learning for understanding programs of life.”
During his time on the Broad Institute board, Schmidt also chaired the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, a group of principally Silicon Valley, intelligence and army operatives who have now charted the direction of the U.S. authorities’s insurance policies on rising tech and AI. Schmidt was also pitched as potential head of a tech-industry job power by the Biden administration.
Government and Public and Private Agencies Team Up
Earlier, in January , the Broad Institute announced that its health-research platform, Terra, which was constructed with Google subsidiary Verily, would companion with Microsoft. As a end result, Terra now permits Google and Microsoft to access a huge trove of genomic information that’s poured into the platform by teachers and analysis establishments from world wide.
In addition, final September , Google teamed up with the Department of Defense as a part of a new AI-driven “predictive health” program that additionally has hyperlinks to the US intelligence neighborhood. While initially targeted on predicting most cancers instances, this initiative clearly plans to increase to predicting the onset of different illnesses earlier than signs seem, together with COVID-19.
As noted by Unlimited Hangout on the time, one of many ulterior motives for this system, from Google’s perspective, was for Google to achieve entry to “the largest repository of disease- and cancer-related medical data in the world,” which is held by the Defense Health Agency. Having unique entry to this information is a enormous boon for Google in its effort to develop and increase its rising suite of AI health-care merchandise.
The army is at the moment getting used to pilot COVID-19-related biometric wearables for “returning to work safely.” Last December , it was announced that Hill Air Force Base in Utah would make biometric wearables a necessary a part of the uniform for some squadrons. For instance, the airmen of the Air Force’s 649th Munitions Squadron should now put on a sensible watch made by Garmin and a sensible ring made by Oura as a part of their uniform.
According to the Air Force, these units detect biometric indicators which are then analyzed for 165 totally different biomarkers by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency/Philips Healthcare AI algorithm that “attempts to recognize an infection or virus around 48 hours before the onset of symptoms.”
The growth of that algorithm started well before the COVID-19 crisis and is a latest iteration of a sequence of army analysis initiatives that seem to have begun under the 2007 DARPA Predicting Health and Disease (PHD) project.
While of curiosity to the army, these wearables are primarily meant for mass use — a massive step towards the infrastructure wanted for the resurrection of a biosurveillance program to be run by the national-security state.
Starting first with the army is sensible from the national-security equipment’s perspective, as the power to watch biometric information, together with feelings, has apparent enchantment for these managing the just lately expanded “insider threat” packages in the military and the Department of Homeland Security.
One indicator of the push for mass use is that the identical Oura sensible ring being utilized by the Air Force was additionally just lately utilized by the NBA to stop COVID-19 outbreaks amongst basketball gamers.
Prior to COVID-19, it was promoted for shopper use by members of the British Royal family and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for enhancing sleep. As just lately as final Monday [April 26, 2021], Oura’s CEO, Harpeet Rai, mentioned that all the way forward for wearable well being tech will quickly be “proactive rather than reactive” as a result of it is going to give attention to predicting illness primarily based on biometric information obtained from wearables in actual time.
Another wearable tied to the army that’s creeping into mass use is the BioButton and its predecessor the BioSticker. Produced by the corporate BioIntelliSense, the modern new BioButton is marketed as a wearable system that’s “a scalable and cost-effective solution for COVID-19 symptom monitoring at school, home and work.” BioIntelliSense received $2.8 million from the Pentagon final December to develop the BioButton and BioSticker wearables for COVID-19.
BioIntelliSense, cofounded and led by former Microsoft HealthVault developer James Mault, now has its wearable sensors being rolled out for widespread use on some faculty campuses and at some U.S. hospitals. In a few of these situations, the corporate’s wearables are getting used to specifically monitor the unwanted side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine versus signs of COVID-19 itself.
BioIntelliSense is at the moment operating a examine, partnered with Philips Healthcare and the University of Colorado, on using its wearables for early COVID-19 detection, which is solely funded by the US military.
While using these wearables is at the moment “encouraged but optional” at these pilot places, might there come a time when they’re mandated in a office or by a authorities? It wouldn’t be unprecedented, as several countries have already required international arrivals to be monitored via use of a wearable throughout a necessary quarantine interval. Saint Lucia is currently using BioButton for this function.
Singapore, which seeks to be among the many first “smart nations” on this planet, has given every single one of its residents a wearable known as a “TraceTogether token” for its contact-tracing program. Either the wearable token or the HintTogether smartphone app is necessary for all workplaces, purchasing malls, resorts, faculties, well being care services, grocery shops and hair salons. Those with out entry to a smartphone are anticipated to make use of the “free” government-issued wearable token.
The Era of Digital Dictatorships Is Nearly Here
Making necessary wearables the brand new regular not only for COVID-19 prevention, however for monitoring well being generally, would institutionalize quarantining individuals who don’t have any signs of an sickness however solely an opaque algorithm’s dedication that very important indicators point out “abnormal” exercise.
Given that no AI is 100% correct and that AI is just nearly as good as the info it’s skilled on, such a system can be assured to make common errors: The query is what number of.
One AI algorithm getting used to “predict COVID-19 outbreaks” in Israel and a few U.S. states is marketed by Diagnostic Robotics; the (possible inflated) accuracy fee the corporate supplies for its product is only 73 %. That means, by the corporate’s personal admission, their AI is improper 27 % of the time. Probably, it’s even much less correct, because the 73 % determine has by no means been independently verified.
Adoption of those applied sciences has benefited from the COVID-19 disaster, as supporters are seizing the chance to speed up their introduction. As a end result, their use will quickly turn into ubiquitous if this advancing agenda continues unimpeded.
Though this push for wearables is clear now, indicators of this agenda have been seen a number of years in the past. In 2018, as an example, insurer John Hancock announced that it might substitute its life insurance coverage choices with “interactive policies” that contain people having their well being monitored by business well being wearables.
Insurance Companies Push for ‘Fitness’ Wearables
Prior to that announcement, John Hancock and different insurers resembling Aetna, Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare offered various rewards for policyholders who wore a health wearable and shared that information with their insurance coverage firm.
In one other pre-COVID instance, the Journal of the American Medical Association published an article in August 2019 that claimed that wearables “encourage healthy behaviors and empower individuals to participate in their health.” The authors of the article, who’re affiliated with Harvard, additional claimed that “incentivizing use of these devices [wearables] by integrating them in insurance policies” could also be an “attractive” coverage method.
The use of wearables for policyholders has since been closely promoted by the insurance industry, each previous to and after COVID-19, and a few speculate that well being insurers might quickly mandate their use in sure instances or as a broader coverage.
These biometric “fitness” units — resembling Amazon’s Halo — can monitor greater than your bodily very important indicators, nonetheless, as they’ll additionally monitor your emotional state. ARPA-H/HARPA’s flagship SAFE HOME program reveals that the power to watch ideas and emotions is an already present objective of these searching for to determine this new company.
According to World Economic Forum luminary and historian Yuval Noah Harari, the transition to “digital dictatorships” could have a “big watershed” moment as soon as governments “start monitoring and surveying what is happening inside your body and inside your brain.”
He says that the mass adoption of such know-how would make human beings “hackable animals,” whereas those that abstain from having this know-how on or of their our bodies would turn into a part of a new “useless” class. Harari has additionally asserted that biometric wearables will sometime be utilized by governments to focus on people who’ve the “wrong” emotional reactions to authorities leaders.
Unsurprisingly, one in all Harari’s largest followers, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, has just lately led his firm into the event of a comprehensive biometric and “neural” wearable primarily based on know-how from a “neural interface” start-up that Facebook acquired in 2019.
Per Facebook, the wearable “will integrate with AR [augmented reality], VR [virtual reality], and human neural signals” and is ready to turn into commercially out there quickly. Facebook additionally notably owns the VR firm Oculus Rift, whose founder, Palmer Luckey, now runs the U.S. army AI contractor Anduril.
As recently reported, Facebook was formed in its early days to be a private-sector substitute for DARPA’s controversial LifeLog program, which sought to each “humanize” AI and construct profiles on home dissidents and terror suspects. LifeLog was additionally promoted by DARPA as “supporting medical research and the early detection of an emerging pandemic.”
It seems that present developments and occasions present that DARPA’s decadeslong effort to merge “health security” and “national security” have now superior additional than ever earlier than.
This could partially be as a result of Bill Gates, who has wielded important affect over well being coverage globally within the final 12 months, is a long-time advocate of fusing well being safety and nationwide safety to thwart each pandemics and “bioterrorists” earlier than they’ll strike, as will be heard in his 2017 speech delivered at that 12 months’s Munich Security Conference.
That identical 12 months, Gates also publicly urged the U.S. army to “focus more training on preparing to fight a global pandemic or bioterror attack.”
In the merging of “national security” and “health security,” any resolution or mandate promulgated as a public well being measure could possibly be justified as essential for “national security,” a lot in the identical means that the mass abuses and struggle crimes that occurred through the post-9/11 “war on terror” have been equally justified by “national security” with little to no oversight.
Yet, on this case, as a substitute of solely shedding our civil liberties and management over our exterior lives, we stand to lose sovereignty over our particular person our bodies.
The NIH, which might home this new ARPA-H/HARPA, has spent hundreds of millions of dollars experimenting with using wearables since 2015, not just for detecting illness signs but in addition for monitoring people’ diets and unlawful drug consumption.
Biden performed a key half in that mission, often called the Precision Medicine initiative, and separately highlighted using wearables in most cancers sufferers as a part of the Obama administration’s associated Cancer Moonshot program.
A Plan to Record, Mark and Manipulate Your Brain
The third Obama-era well being analysis mission was the NIH’s BRAIN initiative, which was launched, amongst different issues, to “develop tools to record, mark and manipulate precisely defined neurons in the living brain” which are decided to be linked to an “abnormal” perform or a neurological illness.
These initiatives passed off at a time when Eric Lander was the cochair of Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology whereas nonetheless main the Broad Institute. It is hardly a coincidence that Eric Lander is now Biden’s high science adviser, elevated to a new cabinet-level place and set to information the course of ARPA-H/HARPA.
Thus, Biden’s newly introduced company, if authorized by Congress, would combine these previous Obama-era initiatives with Orwellian purposes below one roof, however with even much less oversight than earlier than. It would additionally search to increase and mainstream the makes use of of those applied sciences and doubtlessly transfer towards creating insurance policies that may mandate their use.
If ARPA-H/HARPA is authorized by Congress and finally established, it will likely be used to resurrect harmful and long-standing agendas of the national-security state and its Silicon Valley contractors, creating a “digital dictatorship” that threatens human freedom, human society and doubtlessly the very definition of what it means to be human.
To discover extra of Webb’s work, be sure you try her web site, unlimitedhangout.com. You can even discover her movies by looking Bitchute, and he or she has her personal podcast channel known as Unlimited Hangout on Rokfin.com. Warp Speed reporting can be discovered on thelastamericanvagabond.com. At current, Webb can also be nonetheless on Twitter @_whitneywebb.