Global

Stonewall brands lesbians ‘sexual racists’ for raising concerns about sex with transgender women


For many, it was a courageous and long-overdue airing of an necessary and distressing topic: a painstaking investigation into claims that predatory trans women have been pressuring lesbians for sex, revealed on the BBC News web site.

But a leaked electronic mail reveals that the influential trans foyer group Stonewall tried to suppress the investigation earlier than it had even been revealed – and made the extraordinary declare that debating the problems was equal to ‘sexual racism’.

This newest transfer to attempt to stifle free speech will add to rising concerns about the affect of Stonewall, which is paid tens of millions of kilos for advising public our bodies – together with Government departments, police forces and universities – plus a spread of personal corporations.

DON’T BETRAY US: Lesbians protest at being ostracised by trans activists. Over 30,000 participants march at Pride in London Parade in 2015

DON’T BETRAY US: Lesbians protest at being ostracised by trans activists. Over 30,000 contributors march at Pride in London Parade in 2015

Stonewall began as a marketing campaign group for homosexual rights and has been extensively applauded for its important work.

Today, nonetheless, it’s dominated by the marketing campaign for trans rights and controversially units out to advertise self-declared ‘gender identity’ – the doctrine that individuals are no matter gender they are saying they’re – forward of organic sex.

It helps the idea, for instance, that individuals with penises will be lesbians and people with vaginas will be homosexual males. Those who disagree, says Stonewall, are bigots.

Such is Stonewall’s affect {that a} former aide to Boris Johnson has claimed the group has been allowed to dictate Government coverage by advisers who current him with ‘skewed’ pro-trans information.

Earlier this month, the BBC adopted a number of different high-profile our bodies, together with Whitehall departments, in dropping its membership of Stonewall’s Diversity Champions programme.

Under the scheme, employers pay the foyer group to assist ‘embed LGBTQ+ inclusion’ in the best way they work.

The BBC’s announcement got here two weeks after the Corporation revealed an investigation by journalist Caroline Lowbridge through which some lesbians advised how they felt pressured into having a sexual relationship with trans women – particularly, males who say they’re women however who’ve retained their male genitals.

THE investigation cited three lesbian women who mentioned they feared being labelled ‘transphobic’, and risked being shunned and threatened by the homosexual and trans group in the event that they refused to take trans women as companions.

People supporting the organization Stonewall which works for the equality and justice for lesbians, gay men and bisexuals, during the Pride London on July 27 2015

People supporting the group Stonewall which works for the equality and justice for lesbians, homosexual males and bisexuals, in the course of the Pride London on July 27 2015

They advised Lowbridge they felt below a weird type of stress to ‘accept the idea that a penis can be a female sex organ’.

One advised how she had been described as a ‘genital fetishist’ for solely desirous to have relationships with organic women.

Another mentioned: ‘I was told I owed it to my trans sisters to unlearn my “genital confusion”.’

The article additionally included a controversial argument made by a number of trans activists that expressing any desire in sexual companions needs to be thought-about ‘discriminatory’ as such preferences typically exclude trans folks.

This is typically known as ‘the cotton ceiling’ – a distasteful reference to underwear suggesting that trans women are systematically blocked from having sexual relationships with organic females.

The BBC received a lot reward for its investigation, which prompted some lesbians to specific their anger at how they felt ostracised for wishing to type relationships solely with women.

Campaigner Kat Howard wrote that she was ‘incredibly grateful to Caroline Lowbridge, and the BBC for this article’, including: ‘We need help protecting young lesbians everywhere from an LGBT community that would rather see them silenced than stand up to the male perpetrators of assault.’

Yet now it has emerged that months earlier than the article appeared Stonewall’s chief govt Nancy Kelley wrote to the editorial director of BBC News to denounce Lowbridge’s work in an obvious try to get her piece stopped.

In her electronic mail, Kelley advised that the BBC article would find yourself being ‘transphobic’ as a result of it represented trans women as ‘sexual predators’, which was a ‘central anti-trans argument’.

She additional complained that the ‘highly toxic’ cotton ceiling challenge was ‘analogous to issues like sexual racism’.

The annual Trans Pride parade makes its way from Wellington Arch next to Hyde Park down to Soho square on 14 September 2019

The annual Trans Pride parade makes its means from Wellington Arch subsequent to Hyde Park all the way down to Soho sq. on 14 September 2019

And though she acknowledged that in sexual relationships ‘consent is paramount and we all want who we want’, she added that ‘structural oppression can influence who we want’.

Which is to say that social bias, on this case towards those that say they’re trans, can have an effect on even our most personal ideas.

It is known that it took many months of editorial discussions earlier than the article was revealed on October 26.

Stonewall has appeared to substantiate that adjustments had been made to the unique piece, though it stays unclear whether or not this was as a direct results of the leaked electronic mail, despatched in September 2020.

Nor is it identified whether or not the editorial director of BBC News on the time, Kamal Ahmed, took any motion based mostly on the precise concerns raised by Kelley. He was made redundant in February.

As nicely as reward, the article prompted mass complaints from trans rights teams.

An open letter, from Trans Activism UK, had 20,000 signatures and described the article as ‘incredibly dangerous’ for suggesting the problem of lesbians being coerced into sex with trans women was widespread.

The BBC acquired 4,819 complaints within the days following publication, whereas 5,520 messages praised its protection.

Angela Wild, a member of lesbian marketing campaign group Get The L Out who was quoted within the article, advised The Mail on Sunday: ‘For years lesbian activists have been trying to get the message out that it is not bigoted to say “no” to sexual pressure from males who identify as women.

‘The fact that Nancy Kelley has framed the reporting of this issue as transphobia is disgusting. Stonewall are a disgrace and no longer represent the interests of lesbians.’

Author John Boyne described Stonewall as authoritarian for ‘telling gays how to think, who to date and betraying lesbians completely.’

The BBC rejected the complaints towards the article arguing it had gone by ‘rigorous editorial processes’. including that its journalism ought to discover points ‘even where there are strongly held positions’.

Last month, former BBC overseas correspondent Paul Wood advised The Mail on Sunday there was a ‘climate of fear’ on the Corporation round problems with race and gender, with self-appointed censors among the many broadcaster’s personal workers.

rotesters hold a banner during a rally at Parliament Square in October this year

rotesters maintain a banner throughout a rally at Parliament Square in October this yr

Wood wrote that involved executives had discovered themselves on the centre of a ‘culture war’.

Last month an unbiased report into the BBC warned that ‘networks’ of inner affect – together with these representing sexual minorities – might have an effect on its impartiality.

In an announcement to The Mail on Sunday, Stonewall mentioned: ‘We can confirm that we wrote to the former editorial director 14 months ago to raise a concern about a previous version of the article that was relevant to his role in upholding the BBC’s editorial tips.’

The broadcaster’s withdrawal from Stonewall’s Diversity Champions programme prompted an enormous backlash, with many complaints from BBC workers.

When the announcement was made, Corporation govt Rhodri Talfan Davies refused to substantiate whether or not Stonewall had ever efficiently swayed its journalistic output.

But talking to Radio 4’s Women’s Hour final week, Kelley was open about her group’s intentions. ‘I want Stonewall to have more influence on the editorial policy of the BBC,’ she mentioned.

The Corporation’s choice to desert ties with Stonewall – and publish the article – suggests the BBC is taking a way more sturdy method

The challenge of the lobbyists’ affect on the BBC was additionally lined in a ten-part investigative podcast titled Stonewall, made by presenter Stephen Nolan and launched on BBC Sounds.

Stonewall selected to not have interaction with the sequence’ makers.

Stonewall first opted to incorporate transgender points in 2015 below the management of Ruth Hunt, now Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green, a crossbench peer who beforehand labored for the Equality Challenge Unit, advising on sexual orientation and gender id equality.

She was succeeded by Kelley final yr. The group has since turn out to be a vociferous champion of transgender rights, prompting some – together with two of the charity’s founders, broadcasters Simon Fanshawe and Matthew Parris – to accuse Stonewall of abandoning the pursuits of lesbians, homosexual males and bisexual folks.

Under Kelley’s management, Stonewall believes that people have a ‘gender identity’ based mostly on how they really feel inside, which is extra necessary than their sex at beginning.

Terms together with ‘homosexual’, ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’ have now been reframed to consult with ‘same-gender’ attraction – reasonably than ‘same- sex’ attraction – to keep away from excluding trans folks.

This means, in impact, that trans males – organic females – who nonetheless retain their vaginas will be homosexual if they’re interested in males, whereas trans women – organic males – with penises will be lesbians.

The BBC, which has paid substantial sums to Stonewall below its Diversity Champions programme, lately adopted these new definitions in its inner editorial fashion information. It is unclear whether or not these will stay.

Programmes equivalent to Diversity Champions earn Stonewall tens of millions as companies pay to be vetted on their woke insurance policies.

Terms including ‘homosexual’, ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’ have now been reframed to refer to ‘same-gender’ attraction – rather than ‘same- sex’ attraction – to avoid excluding trans people (File photo)

Terms together with ‘homosexual’, ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’ have now been reframed to consult with ‘same-gender’ attraction – reasonably than ‘same- sex’ attraction – to keep away from excluding trans folks (File picture)

Hundreds of hundreds of kilos have been spent on the programmes by Government departments alone.

Being a part of the scheme provides employers the possibility to seem within the charity’s coveted Top 100 office index if their insurance policies meet Stonewall’s approval.

Last yr’s listing included Sainsbury’s, MI6, Oxford University, Sussex Police, Barclays, the Ministry of Justice and the Army.

But those that have minimize their hyperlinks with the scheme embrace Channel 4, Ofcom, Ofsted, the University of Essex, the Equality and Human Rights Commission and a number of other Whitehall departments.

Philosophy professor Kathleen Stock – who was hounded out of Sussex University for saying that organic sex issues and wrote about her expertise within the MoS this month – has accused Stonewall of serving to drive a local weather of bigotry in British universities.

A BBC spokesman mentioned: ‘Many people and organisations make representations to the BBC about various aspects of our coverage.

‘BBC News is editorially independent and the BBC alone decides what we broadcast or publish. The story is on our website for anyone to read.’

The BBC’s expertise with Stonewall is only one fascinating instance of how a bunch of organisations – each private and non-private – are coming below intense stress by a robust foyer group that many concern is inflicting profound injury to the rights of women.

Read More at www.dailymail.co.uk

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

11 − seven =

Back to top button