In June 2021, the U.S. National Security Council launched a brand new “National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism” doc.1 While it’s being largely framed as a software to battle White supremacy and political extremism, the definition of what constitutes a “domestic terrorist” is extremely imprecise and based mostly on ideologies somewhat than particular behaviors.
It’s not tough to think about this coverage getting used to silence political opposition just by labeling anybody who disagrees with the federal government as a home terrorist and charging them with a hate crime.
We’re already seeing indicators suggesting that that is the trail we’re on. July 28, 2021, Dr. Peter Hotez revealed a paper2 in PLOS Biology titled “Mounting Antiscience Aggression in the United States,” by which he suggests criticizing Dr. Anthony Fauci and different scientists must be labeled a “hate crime.” Commenting on the paper, Paul Joseph Watson at Summit News writes:3
“This is yet another transparent effort to dehumanize anti-lockdown protesters and demonize people who merely want to exercise bodily autonomy while elevating Fauci and his ilk to Pope-like status. Science isn’t supposed to be a religious dogma that is set in stone, it’s an ever-evolving knowledge base that changes and improves thanks to dissent and skepticism.”
- Science Depends on Questioning and Challenging Assumptions
- Should We Have Protected Classes That Cannot Be Questioned?
- Will America Accept No-Fly List for Unvaccinated?
- Travel Ban Identified as Effective Coercion Strategy
- Reframing to Confuse the Issue
- The Price of Admission to Society
- Vaccinated Now Comprise the Bulk of Hospitalizations
- Can ‘Big Brother’ Save You From a Virus?
- Even a 100% Vaccination Rate Cannot Eliminate COVID
Science Depends on Questioning and Challenging Assumptions
Attorney Jonathan Turley additionally responded to Hotez’s paper in an August 4, 2021, weblog put up, saying:4
“’Religion is a tradition of religion; science is a tradition of doubt.’ Feynman’s assertion captures how science relies upon upon fixed questioning and difficult of assumptions …
[T]right here stay necessary debates over not simply the underlying science relation to Covid-19 however the implications for such science for public insurance policies. Criminalizing features of that debate would ratchet up the threats in opposition to these with dissenting views, together with some scientists. That would hurt not simply free speech however science in the long term.”
Should We Have Protected Classes That Cannot Be Questioned?
Turley additionally factors out how making scientists a protected class (and one would assume solely these with particular political leanings) is a slippery slope that may probably have unwieldy ramifications:5
“The federal hate crime legal guidelines focus on foundation of an individual’s traits of race, faith, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, and gender identification. We have seen requires including professions like law enforcement officials, which I additionally opposed.
As with law enforcement officials, the inclusion of such professions would have a direct and inimical influence on free speech in our society. Indeed, it might create a slippery slope as different professions demand inclusion from reporters to ministers to physicians. Hate crimes would shortly apply to a big selection of individuals as a consequence of their occupations.”
Will America Accept No-Fly List for Unvaccinated?
Writing for The Atlantic,6 former assistant secretary for Homeland Security Juliette Kayyem posits that individuals who don’t need to be a part of the COVID injection experiment “need to bear the burden” on the subject of stopping the unfold of SARS-CoV-2.
“The number of COVID-19 cases keeps growing, even though remarkably safe, effective vaccines are widely available,” Kayyem writes.7 “Many public companies are responding by reimposing masking guidelines on everybody.
But at this stage of the pandemic, more durable common restrictions usually are not the answer to persevering with viral unfold. While flying, vaccinated individuals ought to not carry the burden for unvaccinated individuals.
The White House has rejected a nationwide vaccine mandate … however a no-fly listing for unvaccinated adults is an apparent step that the federal authorities ought to take.
It will assist restrict the chance of transmission at locations the place unvaccinated individuals journey — and, by setting norms that limit sure privileges to vaccinated individuals, will even assist elevate the stagnant vaccination charges which might be protecting each the financial system and society from totally recovering.”
Travel Ban Identified as Effective Coercion Strategy
According to Kayyem, touring generally and flying specifically just isn’t a human proper, and placing unvaccinated people on a no-fly listing is a matter of nationwide safety, within the sense that the nation wants to guard itself from individuals able to spreading this harmful virus.
She makes no point out of the scientifically confirmed proven fact that not one of the COVID photographs truly forestall you from getting contaminated, and that “vaccinated” people carry the identical viral load because the unvaccinated,8,9 which implies they’re simply as infectious. The predominant distinction is that vaccinated people won’t understand that they’re carriers, as the first impact when the injections do work is lessening signs of an infection.
Kayyem additionally cites a New York Times and Kaiser Family Foundation ballot by which 41% of unvaccinated respondents had stated prohibition on airline journey would sway their determination, together with 11% of these “adamantly opposed” to vaccination. In different phrases, the place free doughnuts and million-dollar lotteries have did not coerce individuals to get the shot, an airline journey ban may do the trick.
Despite her former place inside authorities, she makes no point out of legal guidelines forbidding coercion of medical volunteers, such because the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 45 CFR 46 (subpart A, the Belmont report),10 the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights treaty,11 the Declaration of Helsinki12 or the Nuremberg Code.13 Supreme court docket rulings have additionally clarified that Americans have the suitable to decide on their very own well being care generally.14,15
Reframing to Confuse the Issue
Kayyem suggests circumventing such primary human rights by reframing the problem. She writes:16
“The public debate about making vaccination a precondition for journey, employment, and different actions has described this strategy as vaccine mandates, a time period that … means that unvaccinated individuals are being ordered round arbitrarily.
What is definitely going on, largely, is that establishments are shifting burdens to unvaccinated individuals … somewhat than imposing higher burdens on everybody.
Americans nonetheless have a option to go unvaccinated, however which means giving up on sure societal advantages. Nobody has a constitutional proper to attend The Lion King on Broadway or work at Disney or Walmart … People who nonetheless need to wait and see in regards to the vaccines can proceed doing so. They simply can’t preserve pushing all the prices on everybody else.”
As identified by Swift Headline,17 the proprietor of Atlantic journal, Laurene Powell Jobs, the billionaire widow of Steve Jobs, owns two personal jets herself, giving her the liberty to fly world wide at will, regardless what vaccine mandates may be in place. Many different ultra-rich people would additionally be capable of ignore the principles as a consequence of wealth alone, basically turning them right into a protected class. Swift Headline factors out this projection:18
“The Atlantic went on to say unvaccinated people who find themselves exercising their particular person rights as free Americans ‘do not deserve’ to be a ‘protected class’ …
Jobs’s wealth and sophistication standing is detailed in Breitbart News’ Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow’s guide, ‘Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruptions,’ which ‘exposes the hidden connections between the establishment media and the activist left.’
As Marlow particulars, Jobs’s previous is a privileged one … Jobs ‘married well and inherited a lot of money, and her wealth is tied up in some of world’s largest firms,’ Marlow continues. ‘She is the establishment.’”
The Price of Admission to Society
August 2, 2021, the San Francisco Chronicle additionally revealed an opinion piece19 by the Chronicle editorial board, by which they recommended we must “Make vaccination the price of admission to society.” One option to consider the reasonableness of such a proposition is to exchange COVID “vaccination” with the rest. How about: “Make proof of contraception use the price of admission to bars and nightclubs.”
“Make clear skin the price of admission to gyms and public swimming pools.” “Make being taller than 5’ 9” the value of admission to theme parks.” “Make having a BMI below 25 the price of admission to airline flights.” “Make proof of not having an illness the price of admission to in-hospital care.”
According to the Chronicle editorial board, “the unvaccinated account for over 95% of hospitalizations and deaths.”20 The board doesn’t cite the place it bought that knowledge from, so let’s overview the supply of that knowledge.
In an August 5, 2021, video assertion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky famous that this statistic was obtained by hospitalization and mortality knowledge from January by June 2021 — a timeframe throughout which the overwhelming majority of the United States inhabitants have been unvaccinated.
January 1, 2021, solely 0.5% of the U.S. inhabitants had obtained a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had obtained a number of photographs,21 and as of June 15, 48.7% have been totally “vaccinated.”22
The CDC has additionally identified that you’re not thought-about “fully vaccinated” till two weeks after your second dose (within the case of Pfizer or Moderna), which is given six weeks after your first shot.23 This signifies that in the event you obtain your first dose on June 1, you received’t be “fully vaccinated” till eight weeks later, round August 1.
So, the narrative that we’re in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was created through the use of statistics from a time interval when the U.S. as a complete was largely unvaccinated. When you have a look at more moderen knowledge, the pattern is swinging in the other way.
Vaccinated Now Comprise the Bulk of Hospitalizations
For instance, August 1, 2021, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, director of Israel’s Public Health Services, introduced half of all COVID-19 infections have been among the many totally vaccinated.24
A number of days later, August 5, Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely in poor health COVID-19 sufferers are totally vaccinated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of COVID associated hospitalizations general.25
In Scotland, official knowledge on hospitalizations and deaths present 87% of those that have died from COVID-19 within the third wave that started in early July have been vaccinated,26 and in Gibraltar, which has a 99% COVID jab compliance fee, COVID instances have risen by 2,500% since June 1, 2021.27
A CDC investigation of an outbreak in Barnstable County, Massachusetts between July 6 by July 25, 2021, discovered 74% of those that obtained a prognosis of COVID19, and 80% of hospitalizations, have been among the many totally vaccinated.28,29 Most, however not all, had the Delta variant.
“What the breakthrough cases appear to show is that the delta variant of the coronavirus is more easily carried and transmitted by vaccinated people than its predecessors,” the Chronicle editorial board writes.30
“In any case, the greater apparent transmissibility of the variant makes it that much more important to protect as many people as possible from severe COVID by increasing inoculation rates.”
What the board seems to be saying is that unvaccinated individuals should be protected in opposition to extreme an infection, in opposition to their will, if want be, and the easiest way to try this is to discriminate in opposition to them and deal with them like second-class residents.
Again, a easy option to examine the reasonableness of this argument is to swap out the COVID reference for one thing else. How about, “It’s important to protect as many people as possible from dying in car accidents by raising car prices so fewer people can get behind the wheel.”
Can ‘Big Brother’ Save You From a Virus?
As early as April 2020, The Times within the U.Okay. weighed in with comparable strategies, stating “We need Big Brother to beat this virus.”31 Clare Foges, the writer of the piece in query, went on to say, “Don’t let the civil liberties lobby blind us to the fact that greater state surveillance, including ID cards, is required.”
The argument that Big Brother can shield us from an infection is ludicrous on its face, as a result of no quantity of individuals surveillance can forestall microscopic viruses from circulating.
The No. 1 place of viral unfold is in establishments, corresponding to nursing properties and hospitals, but the employees inside them are among the many most well-trained in pathogenic management. If skilled hospital employees can’t forestall the unfold of viruses, how can authorities officers do it?
Importantly, the argument that we want vaccine passports to show we’re “clean” sufficient to take part in society instantly falls aside once you consider the truth that the COVID photographs don’t present immunity. You can nonetheless be contaminated, carry the virus and unfold it to others.
We’ve already seen a number of examples of conditions the place 100% of individuals have been totally “vaccinated” in opposition to COVID-19 but an outbreak occurred. We’ve even seen over 100 totally COVID injected individuals die from COVID in a single state alone, Massachusetts,32 so it’s probably there are actually many hundreds of totally “vaccinated” who’ve died from COVID.
Even a 100% Vaccination Rate Cannot Eliminate COVID
Most just lately, Carnival cruise traces skilled an outbreak regardless of each final individual on that ship having proof of COVID “vaccination.”33 The cruise liner had even deliberately decreased capability from 4,000 to 2,800 to offer ample social distancing functionality. None of the measures labored. People bought sick anyway, which makes excellent sense in the event you keep in mind that the shot doesn’t present immunity, solely symptom discount.
Cases corresponding to these clearly reveal that even when everybody will get the shot, SARS-CoV-2 will mutate and proceed to flow into, taking individuals out right here and there. To assume that giving up primary rights and freedoms is the reply merely isn’t logical. Taking accountability in your personal well being is, and that features deciding if and the way you need to shield your self from SARS-CoV-2.
Not everyone seems to be deathly afraid of COVID-19. Many understand there are secure and efficient therapies obtainable, such because the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’s I-MASS Prevention and At-Home Treatment protocol and I-MASK+ Early Outpatient Treatment protocol.
Nebulized hydrogen peroxide will also be used for prevention and therapy of COVID-19, as detailed in Dr. David Brownstein’s case paper34 and Dr. Thomas Levy’s free e-book, “Rapid Virus Recovery.” And if there’s efficient therapy, there’s little have to threat everlasting negative effects from an experimental gene expertise that may solely present a slender vary of safety within the first place.