Patents Prove SARS-CoV-2 Is a Manufactured Virus

In a January 2021 lecture, Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., launched the time period “the pandemic virus industrial complex,” to explain the educational, navy and industrial complexes which might be driving the pandemic agenda and obscuring information that point out SARS-CoV-2 is a artifical virus.

In the video above, David E. Martin, Ph.D., introduces surprising proof that SARS-CoV-2 is certainly a artifical bioweapon, and has been within the works for many years. Much of this analysis was funded by none aside from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) underneath the course of Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Pandemic virus industrial complicated certainly! You don’t need to miss this bombshell interview, carried out by Reiner Fuellmich,1 founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee2,3 (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss or ACU4). A transcript5 is on the market when you want to learn it.

SARS-CoV-2 Is Not a Novel Coronavirus at All

Martin has been within the enterprise of monitoring patent purposes and approvals since 1998. His firm, M-Cam International Innovation Risk Management, is the world’s largest underwriter of intangible belongings utilized in finance in 168 international locations. M-Cam has additionally monitored organic and chemical weapons treaty violations on behalf of the U.S. authorities, following the anthrax scare in September 2001.

According to Martin, there are greater than 4,000 patents referring to the SARS coronavirus. His firm has additionally completed a complete evaluate of the financing of analysis involving the manipulation of coronaviruses that gave rise to SARS as a subclade of the beta coronavirus household.

In his testimony to ACU, he critiques a few of the most pertinent patents, displaying SARS-CoV-2 just isn’t a novel coronavirus in any respect however, reasonably, a artifical virus that has been within the works for many years.

A complete record of 120 patents referring to SARS-CoV-2-associated options may be discovered here.6 The options patented are referenced in two key scientific papers, “A Novel Bat Coronavirus Reveals Natural Insertions at the S1/S2 2 Cleavage Site of the Spike Protein and a Possible Recombinant 3 Origin of HCoV-19,” and “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.”

On that record, we see quite a few patents detailing manipulation of the polybasic cleavage website for SARS-CoV, the spike protein, in addition to ACE2 binding, all three of that are presupposed to be distinctive options of SARS-CoV-2. As defined by Martin:

“We took the reported gene sequence, which was reportedly remoted as a novel virus, indicated as such by the ICTV, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses of the World Health Organization. We took the precise genetic sequences that had been reportedly novel and reviewed these in opposition to the patent data that had been out there as of the spring of 2020.

And what we discovered, as you will see on this report, are over 120 patented items of proof, to recommend that the declaration of a ‘novel coronavirus’ was truly totally a fallacy.

There was no novel coronavirus. There are numerous, very delicate modifications of coronavirus sequences which were uploaded, however there was no single recognized ‘novel coronavirus’ in any respect.

As a matter of reality, we discovered data within the patent data, of sequences attributed to novelty, going to patents that had been sought as early as 1999. So not solely was this not a novel something … it is not been novel for over twenty years.”

Spike Protein Vaccine for Coronavirus Patented 22 Years Ago

Up till 1999, coronavirus patents had been all within the veterinary sciences. The first coronavirus vaccine to make use of the S spike protein was patented by Pfizer in January 2000 (Patent No. 6372224). It was a spike protein virus vaccine for canine coronavirus. You can lookup the precise patents for your self on the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s web site,7 when you like.

“Ralph Baric’s work on … rabbit cardiomyopathy … after which canine coronavirus in Pfizer’s work, to determine methods to develop S spike protein vaccine goal candidates, [give] rise to the apparent proof that …

… neither the coronavirus idea of a vaccine, nor the precept of the coronavirus itself, as a pathogen of curiosity with respect to the spike proteins habits, is something novel in any respect. As a matter of reality, it is 22 years outdated based mostly on patent filings,” Martin says.

From HIV Vaccine Development to COVID-19

According to Martin, Fauci and the NIAID “found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines,” and in 1999, Fauci funded analysis at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (the place Baric has a lab) to create “an infectious replication-defective coronavirus” particularly focused for human lung epithelium.

The patent for that replication-defective coronavirus that assaults human lung cells was filed April 19, 2002 (Patent No. 7279327). “In other words, we made SARS,” Martin says. Or maybe extra precisely, Fauci and UNC did. Several months after that patent submitting, the SARS outbreak in Asia occurred.

“That patent, issued as U.S. Patent 7279327 … clearly lays out in very particular gene sequencing, the truth that we knew that the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding area, the S-1 spike protein, and different components of what we’ve come to know as this scourge pathogen, was not solely engineered, however may very well be synthetically modified within the laboratory utilizing nothing greater than gene sequencing applied sciences.

Taking pc code and turning it into a pathogen, or an intermediate of the pathogen, and that expertise was funded solely, within the early days, as a means by which we might harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.”

Coronavirus — A Biological Weapon Candidate Since 2001?

As talked about, Martin has monitored organic and chemical treaty violations since 2001, following the anthrax assaults. Throughout the autumn of 2001, an “enormous number” of bacterial and viral pathogens had been patented by means of the National Institutes of Health, the NIAID, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) and their worldwide collaborators.

“Our concern was that coronavirus was being seen as not only a potential manipulatable agent for potential use as a vaccine vector, but it was also very clearly being considered as a biological weapon candidate,” Martin says.

Before the SARS outbreak in China, Martin reported these issues publicly. “So, you can imagine how disappointed I am to be sitting here … having 20 years earlier pointed that there was a problem looming on the horizon with respect to coronavirus,” he says.

CDC Holds Patents on SARS Coronavirus

In April 2003, after the SARS outbreak in China had occurred, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tried to file a patent for the whole gene sequence for the SARS coronavirus (Patent No. 7220852). This is a violation of 35 U.S. Code Section 101, which states you can’t patent a naturally-occurring substance.

That CDC patent additionally had a number of by-product patents related to it, together with U.S. patent 46592703P and U.S. patent 7776521. These two patents cowl the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus and the means for detecting it utilizing RT PCR testing.

Together, these patents are extremely problematic, as a result of when you personal each, then “you have a cunning advantage to being able to control 100% of the provenance of not only the virus itself, but also its detection, meaning you have entire scientific and message control,” Martin explains.

The CDC tried to justify the patent by saying they had been being sought in an effort to make sure that everybody could be free to analysis coronaviruses. However, that’s a lie, Martin says. The U.S. patent workplace rejected the patent on the gene sequence as unpatentable as a result of it was 99.9% equivalent to a coronavirus that was already within the public area.

The CDC paid an enchantment advantageous in 2006 and once more in 2007. They additionally paid an extra payment to maintain the applying non-public. In the top, the CDC overrode the patent examiner’s rejection and secured the patent in 2007.

“Last time I checked, if you’re trying to make information available for the public research, you would not pay a fee to keep the information private,” Martin says. According to Martin, the gene sequence filed by the CDC in 2003, 2005 and 2006 is 89% to 99% equivalent to the sequence recognized as SARS-CoV-2.

Sequoia Pharmaceuticals

April 28, 2003 — three days after the CDC filed its patent for the SARS coronavirus — Sequoia Pharmaceuticals filed a patent on an antiviral agent for the remedy and management of infectious coronavirus (Patent No. 7151163). So, the CDC recordsdata a patent on SARS coronavirus, and three days later there’s a remedy?

This strongly suggests there was a working relationship behind the scenes. Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, based in 2002, develops antiviral therapeutics with a particular concentrate on drug-resistant viruses.8 Its lead buyers embrace the Wellcome Trust.

But there’s one more drawback with Sequoia’s 2003 submitting for an antiviral agent. It was truly issued and printed earlier than the CDC patent on SARS coronavirus had been granted, which did not occur till 2007, and the CDC had paid to maintain the applying non-public.

“So, the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties is zero,” Martin says. “It just isn’t bodily potential so that you can patent a factor that treats a factor that had not been printed, as a result of CDC had paid to maintain it secret.

This, my mates, is the definition of felony conspiracy, racketeering and collusion. This just isn’t a principle, that is proof. You can’t have information sooner or later, and type a remedy for a factor that didn’t exist. It is a RICO case …

And the RICO sample, which was established in April of 2003 for the primary coronavirus, was performed out to precisely the identical schedule once we see SARS COV-2 present up, when we’ve Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by telephone from the vaccine analysis middle at NIAID, previous to the definition of the novel subclade. How do you deal with a factor, earlier than you even have the factor?”

Sanofi Holds Patents to Novel Feature of SARS-CoV-2

The subsequent bombshell revelation occurred on June 5, 2008, when Ablynx, now a a part of Sanofi, filed a sequence of patents detailing what we have been informed are novel options of SARS-CoV-2, particularly the polybasic cleavage website, the spike protein and the ACE2 receptor binding area. The first of these patents, U.S. Patent No. 9193780, was issued November 24, 2015.

Between 2016 and 2019, a sequence of patents had been issued to Ablynx and Sanofi masking the RNA strands and the subcomponents of the gene strands.

Between 2008 and 2017, a sequence of patents had been additionally filed by a lengthy record of gamers, together with Crucell, Rubeus Therapeutics, Children’s Medical Corporation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in München, Protein Science Corporation, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, University of Iowa, University of Hong Kong and the Chinese National Human Genome Center in Shanghai.

This sequence of patents element ever single attribute that’s presupposed to be distinctive to SARS-CoV-2, based on the paper, “A Novel Bat Coronavirus Reveals Natural Insertions at the S1/S2 2 Cleavage Site of the Spike Protein and a Possible Recombinant 3 Origin of HCoV-19.”

This paper has routinely been used to determine the so-called novel coronavirus that’s SARS-CoV-2. Yet there are 73 patents, issued between 2008 and 2019, that describe the very components which might be stated to be distinctive to SARS-CoV-2. Patents have been filed for SARS-CoV-2’s polybasic cleavage website, the ACE2 receptor binding area, and the spike protein.

“So, there was no ‘outbreak’ of SARS, because we had engineered all of the elements of that,” Martin says. And by 2016, when Baric printed a paper warning that SARS coronavirus was “poised for human emergence,” the virus in query had already been patented for industrial exploitation 73 instances!

The Pandemic Virus Industrial Complex Is Swimming in Profit

Baric is likely one of the few individuals who has profited considerably from this pandemic, which he seems to have been a part of creating. Another is Fauci. The identical drug firms that maintain patents on not-so-novel SARS-CoV-2 options are additionally raking in earnings from their COVID photographs.

In 2015, Dr. Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance that funneled analysis {dollars} from the NIAID to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for coronavirus analysis, who has promoted the official narrative that SARS-CoV-2 has a pure origin, said:9

“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”

Sounds an terrible lot like what we’re going through proper now, does not it? At the top of the day, this pandemic has primarily been about revenue and the shifting of wealth, from the lower- and middle-classes to the already ultra-wealthy. This is a struggle on the general public, waged utilizing organic weapons and information warfare, with the final word objective of “resetting” life and commerce as we all know it.

Intentional Weaponization of Spike Protein

Martin says:

“There wasn’t a lab leak. This was an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins to inject into folks, to get them hooked on a pan-coronavirus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was launched, and each research that is ever been launched to attempt to confirm a lab leak, is a purple herring.

[There are] 73 patents on every little thing clinically novel — 73, all issued earlier than 2019. And I’m going to provide the greatest bombshell of all to show that this was truly not a launch of something, as a result of Patent No. 7279327, the patent on the recombinant nature of that ‘lung-targeting’ coronavirus, was transferred mysteriously from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to the National Institutes of Health in 2018.

Now, here is the issue with that. Under the Bayh-Dole Act, the U.S. authorities already has what’s referred to as a march-in proper provision. That means if the U.S. authorities has paid for analysis, they’re entitled to profit from that analysis at their demand or at their whim.

So, clarify why, in 2017 and 2018, immediately the National Institutes of Health need to take possession of the patent that they already had rights to, held by the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. And how did they should file a Certificate of Correction to guarantee that it was legally enforceable, as a result of there was a typographical error within the grant reference within the first submitting?

They wanted to guarantee that not solely did they get it proper, however they wanted to verify each typographical error that was contained within the patent was right on THE SINGLE PATENT REQUIRED, to develop the Vaccine Research Institute’s mandate, which was shared between the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and Moderna in November of 2019, when UNC Chapel Hill, NIAID and Moderna started the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine — a month earlier than an outbreak ever occurred.”

‘New Normal’ Coined by Merck at 2004 Bioterrorism Conference

The extra we study, the grimmer it will get. Clearly, plans for our current-day predicament had been laid nicely over a decade in the past. According to Martin, the slogan “The New Normal” was coined by Merck throughout a January 6, 2004, convention referred to as “SARS and Bioterrorism, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Therapeutics, and Immune Modulators.”

This time period has now develop into a branded marketing campaign adopted by the World Health Organization, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and the remainder of the pandemic virus industrial complex.

Incidentally, Fauci is on the board of administrators of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, as is Dr. Chris Elias, president of the Global Development Program on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and George Fu Gao, Ph.D., director-general of the Chinese CDC and a Chinese communist get together member.10

It’s a lengthy interview, however it doesn’t disappoint. I urge you to take the time to take heed to it, as Martin actually lays out the timeline of when and the way this pandemic virus got here to be. He’s additionally printed a 205-page paper11 detailing Fauci’s involvement which you can obtain from

It now appears clearer than ever that every little thing we’re experiencing was deliberate and executed with a revenue motive in thoughts. Armed with this new information, I urge you as soon as once more to reclaim your life, your freedom and independence, and resist this manufactured notion of a “new normal.” A brand new regular will certainly be established if we persist, however will probably be the converse of what the pandemic virus industrial complicated is hoping for.

We will resurrect drugs and science from the induced coma these fields are at the moment in, and usher in a new period of medical freedom, private liberty, accountable and clear authorities, fiscal stability and well being care that truly promotes well being reasonably than sluggish dying. It could take a whereas, however collectively, we are able to do it. To get there, preserve sharing information equivalent to that supplied by Martin on this mind-blowing interview in any method you possibly can. In the top, fact will prevail. Believe it.


Source Link –

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 × 4 =

Back to top button