The video above options the primary of a number of tribunals1 on COVID-19, through which we expose the willful misconduct that runs like a pink thread by way of all the pandemic narrative. This first one is sponsored by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), a 501c3 nonprofit group chartered to teach and empower you with information that promotes well being and happiness for you and your loved ones.
The panel, consisting of various consultants from totally different fields, together with scientists, docs, authors, activists and attorneys, is hosted by Alexis Baden-Mayor. The matter, after all, is COVID-19, which has risen as an important matter of our lifetime.
Collectively, the panelists, which embody yours actually, have spent nicely over 75,000 hours investigating myriad occasions that make up the worldwide response to COVID-19, from its possible lab origin, to the place we’re at current. As famous by Baden-Mayor, we discover ourselves “trapped in a web of questionable science and rampant acts of alleged willful misconduct with no apparent and insight.”
“Collectively, our panelists have published groundbreaking books, lawsuits and peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts on the subject of COVID-19 that currently form the foundation of many ongoing legal efforts, attempting to protect the inalienable rights of billions of good people worldwide,” Baden-Mayor says.
“It has been greater than a 12 months because the SARS-CoV-2 virus got here into public consciousness, and what started as two weeks to flatten the curve has morphed right into a endless emergency. Is this nonetheless an emergency? And in that case, why are we empowering the identical individuals to guide us who’ve already confirmed their very own incompetence?
At the very least tonight, we are going to take up the work that ought to have been carried out way back by mainstream media networks which have persistently vacated their obligation to impartially examine and objectively inform their audiences. We will ask the laborious inquiries to individuals who have been censored and vilified merely for lifting their voices to assist individuals all through the world.
Some of the questions we pose could really feel uncomfortable at first, however are however important to our collective freedom and our kids’s future. And a few of the solutions you hear could problem the narratives you’ve got been conditioned to simply accept. We will pay attention as our skilled panelists share verifiable information, and invite you to resolve for your self whether or not the information you’re listening to has benefit.
This tribunal doesn’t exist to let you know what to suppose or what you’ll want to know. This tribunal of consultants has gathered to empower you, to suppose for your self and create alternatives so that you can take motion.
The alleged acts of willful conduct threaten not solely our freedom, but additionally unnecessarily prolongs the disaster by stopping the free trade of concepts and medical information that saves lives. We will embark on a historic journey collectively in quest of solutions to laborious questions and options to difficult issues …
If you’re just like the billions of people that have felt that one thing simply is not proper, and you do not know who to belief. I guarantee you, you aren’t alone. Take coronary heart and have braveness collectively. We are going to ensure COVID-19 involves an finish. And most significantly by no means occurs once more.”
The audio system and panelists featured on this first tribunal, along with myself, are:
Dolores Cahill, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and immunologist,2 founding father of the World Freedom Alliance3 and a member of the World Doctors Alliance,4 which is dedicated “to debate the causes of harm resulting from the coronavirus act measures and to raise issues that expose harmful medical and life-limiting practices detrimental to the well-being of all living men women and children”
Kimberly and Foster Gamble, creators of two THRIVE documentaries5
Kevin Jenkins, govt director of the Urban Global Health Alliance6 and producer of the censored documentary movie “Medical Racism: The New Apartheid”7
Dr. Peter McCullough, vice chief of inner drugs at Baylor University Medical Center and co-author of “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection” within the American Journal of Medicine.8,9 McCullough is likely one of the high 5 most-published medical researchers within the United States
Joy Fritz, a former demise data clerk10 and contributor to The Defender11
Ronnie Cummins, co-founder and worldwide director of the OCA and its Mexican affiliate Via Organica12
Tara Thorton, co-founder of the Freedom Angels Foundation, which fights in opposition to tightening vaccination laws13
Dr. James Lyon Weiler, Ph.D., a analysis scientist, president and CEO of The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge14
Anna Garner, founding father of New Mexico Stands Up!, a volunteer-driven group that gives public curiosity authorized companies to revive important rights and well being freedom15
Dr. Henry Ealy (“Dr. H”), a licensed holistic nutritionist, founder and govt group director of the Energetic Health Institute16
Sayer Ji, founding father of GreenMed Info17
David “Avocado” Wolfe, a uncooked meals advocate18
The Truth About COVID-19
The first roundtable dialogue begins off with a prerecorded video that includes Cummins and me. Our full-length dialogue was summarized in “The Book You’ll Want to Read Before It Disappears.” I’ve included it once more, above, on your comfort. The e-book in query is “The Truth About COVID-19,” which we wrote collectively.
In that e-book, we assessment how the COVID-19 pandemic was by no means a pandemic in any actual, historic sense, the ways used to maintain the fraud going, the possible origin of the virus, the less-than-humanitarian intentions driving the pandemic narrative as a complete, censored prevention and therapy methods, the potential hazards of COVID-19 “vaccines,” why vaccine passports are a ticket to totalitarianism and rather more.
Shocking Statistics Are Being Ignored
Anyone who has seemed on the U.S. federal vaccine hostile occasions reporting system (VAERS) will probably be struck by the shockingly excessive variety of critical accidents and deaths occurring after receiving the COVID-19 “vaccine.”
Many of those happen throughout the first 24 to 48 hours after taking the vaccine, which ought to lift computerized questions. Yet the timing of those accidents and deaths are ignored, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration insists that none of them has any relation to the vaccines,19 which merely is not plausible. As famous by Baden-Mayor:
“As of April 16 , the next information is confirmed: At least 3,186 Americans have died after receiving experimental COVID injections. At least 1,015 of these deaths have occurred inside 24 hours. According to the assorted medical data, at the least 115 anticipating moms have spontaneously aborted their infants or given beginning to stillborn infants after receiving experimental COVID injections.
At least 86,080 Americans have reported some type of damage post-injection, together with at the least 6,282 individuals who have required hospitalization because of the severity of their accidents.
We help everybody’s proper to entry experimental COVID injections, however it is very important observe that they aren’t FDA accredited. Currently the medical trials are ongoing till October 27, 2022, for Moderna, the NIH research till January 2, 2023, for Johnson & Johnson, and April 6, 2023, for the Pfizer-BioNTech.
Under present knowledgeable consent legal guidelines, you have got the proper to say no using any experimental product with out concern of job loss, discrimination or segregation from the society that you simply paid taxes to help. It is your physique. It is your alternative.”
Side Effect Reports Are Skyrocketing
These numbers are skyrocketing by the day. As of April 23, 2021, the overall variety of hostile studies had jumped to 118,902, 12,618 of which had been critical and three,544 of which died.20 While stunning as is, the actual numbers are undoubtedly even larger, as VAERS is a passive surveillance system that depends on voluntary reporting.
Historically, lower than 10% of vaccine unintended effects are reported to VAERS.21 An investigation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services put it as little as 1%.22,23
What this implies is unintended effects may very well be 10 occasions and even 100 occasions larger than reported. We might, in actuality, be anyplace from 126,000 to 1.2 million critical unintended effects, and anyplace from 35,440 to 354,400 vaccine-related deaths already.
Making issues even worse, it seems VAERS is backlogged by about three months, so the info you see on VAERS doesn’t mirror the true, real-time numbers of hostile reactions being reported.
This is necessary to know, because the system’s main aim is to “detect new, unusual or rare vaccine adverse events” as a solution to monitor security of vaccines, and the better the backlog, the extra individuals will probably be uncovered to a probably harmful vaccine. A backlog by months additionally suggests an infinite variety of hostile results are occurring, and that in and of itself is extremely disturbing.
It can be extremely possible that almost all of the deaths from the vaccine will probably be attributable to antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE) or paradoxical immune enhancement (PIE), as detailed in “How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System” and “Will Vaccinated People Be More Vulnerable to Variants?“
We won’t see these deaths till the autumn, as a result of that’s the typical season when coronavirus infections happen, be it SARS-CoV2 or different coronaviruses chargeable for the frequent chilly. So, when uncovered to a wild coronavirus, there may be certainly a danger that ADE response, attributable to pathogenic priming, will produce an extreme and probably deadly immune response.
Steadfast Suppression of Attempts to Save Patients
As famous by McCullough in the course of the roundtable dialogue, one thing very uncommon occurred in 2020. For the primary time, docs around the globe had been actively discouraged and prevented from saving their sufferers. There was “an enormous, complete, pervasive, steadfast suppression of any attempts to help patients with COVID-19,” he says.
He factors out that esteemed medical services have developed efficient therapy protocols for COVID-19, together with Harvard, Johns Hopkins and Emory, but these have all been suppressed and censored.
“It’s stunning,” McCullough says. “By this time, we should be using the Harvard protocol, the Emory protocol. How about Hopkins? I’ll take any one of them … We seem to somehow have developed a uniform game plan … to do nothing to help patients with COVID-19, passively allow as much suffering hospitalization and death as possible, create enormous amounts of fear in our society, and then be prepared for mass vaccination.”
Willfully Inflated Death Counts
Fritz, a licensed demise reporting clerk who has labored for years helping docs and performing as an interface between funeral houses and state and federal reporting companies, is now serving to households right demise certificates that inaccurately listing COVID-19 as the reason for demise.
March 24, 2020, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention printed a COVID alert that some say has led to considerably inflated and due to this fact fraudulent demise counts.
In response to Baden-Mayor’s questions, “Did the COVID alert No. 2 lead to inflated dead counts? And what are some of the problems associated with the death certificate reporting that make the process susceptible to data manipulation and therefore significant inaccuracy?” Fritz replies:
“For context, the COVID No. 2 alert and the follow-up NBSS April steering was issued inside two weeks of the emergency being declared in March 2020. Their express steering was given earlier than there was any population-wide testing out there to statistically decide the an infection fatality charges, so we did not have likelihood [data] but.
Yet, with none inhabitants surveillance out there, any good information, they asserted that COVID could be the underlying explanation for demise ‘most of the time.’ They made a declaration of statistical likelihood earlier than there was nationwide statistics out there. Then they disseminated this unfounded probabilistic rationale to those that formally report, approve, code and tally our mortality statistics.
People want to grasp the significance of the underlying explanation for demise. If you take a look at a demise certificates, it has a bunch of information on it. The underlying explanation for demise is the diagnostic code you decide to report in our mortality statistics. That’s the one trigger that is going to be reported about that affected person. It’s crucial.
Normally, earlier than this, infections weren’t given because the underlying explanation for demise, for probably the most half, for sufferers over 60 years outdated. I bought loads of instances the place the physician is saying it was MRSA, an antibiotic-resistant type of staph that is actually laborious to deal with and might kill individuals.
The important data registrars would reject demise certificates that had underlying explanation for demise with MRSA and say, ‘Go again and ask the physician what they had been on treatment for. Did they’ve diabetes? Did they’ve power sicknesses?’ So, this flies within the face of what I used to be used to, so far as infections being highlighted because the underlying explanation for demise as a rule.”
Illogical COVID Rules Have Created a Statistical Mess
Fritz goes on to assessment what occurred the final time the National Center for Health Statistics had a governing committee make suggestions relating to contagious or vaccine-preventable illness. On web page 139 of the 2003 report from this panel, the committee requested find out how to tackle questions akin to “Was a contagious disease present at time of death, or did the death result from a vaccine preventable disease?”
“The committee subgroup on death certificates decided against the death certificate being updated to include those risk factors,” Fritz says. The committee said that “the death certificate is not a medical record and is not intended to include prevalence data.”
“This is a very important part of what the precedence was, before this pandemic, about contagious and vaccine-preventable diseases on death certificates,” Fritz says.
“They deliberately, in 2020, modified this with the COVID steering. They created this lopsided reporting system — and so they did not make it for all contagious ailments — they simply made it for COVID. So, it is naturally going to create a ballooning of reporting for this one contagious illness.
Then, in case you take a look at the context, these are consultants at our statistical regulatory our bodies. They know in regards to the statistics on demise certificates and [the importance of] accuracy. These guys know that — in keeping with peer-reviewed medical literature, throughout the board, in each continent on the earth — 20% to 60% of our demise certificates have the unsuitable or an inaccurate explanation for demise listed.
So, we now have a serious margin of error that these consultants already knew about. And now they’re manipulating the system to exploit out the information … with out fixing the system. That’s very problematic.”
While Fritz is making an attempt to assist households right demise certificates that incorrectly listing COVID-19 as the reason for demise, that job simply bought harder. She not too long ago acquired a textual content from her native authorities in California, promoting that FEMA is now giving households $9,000 to cowl funeral bills if the one you love died from COVID-19, and the best way you show that’s with a demise certificates itemizing COVID-19 as the reason for demise.
What’s extra, this cost program will go on to 2025, so it not solely deincentivizes individuals from correcting demise certificates issued in 2020, however incentivizes the continued mislisting of COVID-19 as the reason for demise presently and into the long run, utilizing bribery.
Fritz is founding a nonprofit 501c3 group referred to as the Factual Reporting Advocacy Network to assist educate households, medical officers, certifiers, mortuaries and others in regards to the significance of accuracy in demise certificates, as a result of it impacts nationwide and world statistics, which in flip drive all types of funding, akin to medical analysis.
She’s additionally pushing for an impartial nationwide audit of COVID-19 death data to determine true explanation for demise and to replace the certificates accordingly.
Roundtable 2: The Medical Ethics Panel
The OCA tribunal, which is three hours lengthy, options roundtables with 9 extra panelists. I hope you are taking the time to hearken to all of them. Roundtable 2, which begins on the 50-minute mark, consists of Sayer Ji, Dr. Ealy and Jenkins, who talk about willful misconduct because it pertains to medical ethics.
Ji evaluations how public well being officers have did not honor the ethics of medication and what may be finished to right course and serve those that are desperately searching for solutions. As famous by Ji, you can not make moral medical choices until you realize each the dangers and the advantages, so the censorship of medical information is, in a really actual sense, a violation of human rights.
March 23, 2021, Ealy printed a peer-reviewed paper, “COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During a Global Health Crisis — An Evidence-Based Position Paper to Ensure Ethical Conduct,” out there at no cost studying and obtain on GreenMedInfo.24
In it, he substantiates McCullough’s allegation of rampant, wanton misconduct amongst public well being officers, the energetic suppression of protected and efficient remedies, and pandemic measures being carried out based mostly on incorrect assumptions and outright lies.
One lie that allowed for the implementation of draconic measures was that SARS-CoV-2 was being unfold asymptomatically. There’s no proof of this, and from a virology standpoint, having a respiratory an infection with out signs is extremely unlikely.
The PCR take a look at getting used as a diagnostic device can be problematic, as revealed within the Corman-Drosten assessment,25 headed by former Pfizer chief scientist Dr. Michael Eaton. The take a look at was developed earlier than a viral isolate was out there, which implies we do not even know if it is detecting the precise SARS-CoV-2 virus. On high of that, well being companies instructed labs to make use of extreme amplification cycles, recognized to end in huge numbers of false positives.
Ealy additionally discusses a paper26 written in collaboration with crew of different investigators printed in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, titled, “COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective.” This paper particulars how the CDC has enabled the corruption of case- and fatality-reporting information in violation of federal regulation.
The panelists additionally tackle racial disparities, akin to how communities of colour are being disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, each the sickness and pandemic measures, and the U.S. authorities’s historical past of knowingly withholding evidence-based cures.
Ealy additionally factors out that the CDC has recognized for the previous 20 years that 35% to 45% of Americans are poor in vitamin A; 37% to 46% are poor in vitamin C; 65% to 95% are poor in vitamin D; 60% to 84% are poor in vitamin E; and 11% to fifteen% of Americans are poor in zinc.
These are key vitamins to mount an efficient immune response. Yet no steering has been issued for correcting these widespread dietary deficits — not prior to now, and never now, although a big physique of analysis now exhibits nutritional vitamins C, D and zinc play a vital function in stopping COVID-19 and bettering outcomes.
You additionally do not need to miss Jenkins’ impassioned speech through which he strips the pandemic right down to the naked bones and exposes what it is actually all about. It’s about turning mankind into slaves. It’s about systemic annihilation. They need to management our our bodies and minds, and to try this, they have to first strip us of our freedom. That’s what this pandemic is all about.
“I’m here to hurt your feelings today,” Jenkins says. “I’m not right here to make you are feeling good. The backside line is you’re … locked out of the reality since you’ve allowed it to occur. This is the 12 months of motion.
A 12 months of taking all of it again. This is a 12 months of flying free … We are at struggle for humanity. This has nothing to do with race. Race is a distraction … Are they censoring since you are black or white? They’re censoring us as a result of we’re telling the reality.
Big tech, massive pharma, finance, schooling — they’re all working in opposition to us. We have failed, all of us. So, you have to rise up. Come be part of us at Urban Global Health. Come be part of us at Freedom Airways.27 Join the entire different teams.”
Roundtable 3: Questionable Science
Roundtable 3, which begins across the 1 hour 30-minute mark, consists of Cahill, Lyons, Weiler and Garner, who assessment points revolving round questionable science and the regulation. Cahill begins by reviewing absolutely the lack of empirical proof supporting using face masks, social distancing and lockdowns as a mitigation methods to scale back viral unfold.
Cahill’s group, the World Freedom Alliance, not too long ago launched the Hope & Accountability venture, often known as The European Spring, which goals to carry decision-makers and docs accountable for his or her scientific misconduct. Notices of legal responsibility are being despatched off to members of the European Parliament, Presidents and Prime Ministers throughout Europe, in addition to ministers for well being and the regulators. She explains:
“A discover of legal responsibility, which is predicated within the rule of regulation, [specifies] that hurt will not be actually finished by massive organizations. Harm is finished by one man or girl to a different man or a lady.
Responsibility rests on particular person individuals, and on their roles, for instance, the prime minister, the minister for well being — but additionally the person who’s the top of the regulatory company — that if there are a number of deaths in a rustic, the regulators … in every particular person nation, are required by regulation to cease the medical trial.
They’re additionally required to offer full knowledgeable consent so that everyone enrolled in these gene remedy, so-called vaccinations, are required to learn in regards to the hostile occasions. And you aren’t allowed to enroll individuals that can’t give consent, akin to these with dementia …
Under regulation, you’re accountable as people for what you do, and what you fail to do. But after all, the person who’s most accountable is the person who really put that needle into these individuals. And that, in our regulation is a extreme crime, contributory manslaughter. So, the people who find themselves concerned in administering [these injections] … and trigger big [numbers of] hostile occasions and demise, they are going to be accountable.”
Weiler delves into additional particulars in regards to the unscientific use of PCR exams, critical flaws within the exams’ design, the numerous methods through which false positives may be created, and the mechanics of how your immune system really works to battle an infection.
Landmark Court Filings Underway
Garner, an legal professional and founding father of New Mexico Stands Up! discusses probably landmark instances filed in protection of American individuals, and the significance of relying evidence-based science when making public well being choices.
“We were doing what we can to get the word out and get it to the courts, which may be our last bastion — the wall that could fall down in terms of the lies that we’re being told,” she says. “We have been instructed so many lies, we have been instructed lies in regards to the variety of instances, we have been instructed lies in regards to the variety of deaths brought on by COVID.
Fear has completely wrecked all people’s sense of proportion of what is proper and unsuitable. And it is a battle of proper versus unsuitable, as a result of these of us who have not drunk the cocaine, as I name it, relatively than the Kool-Aid, know that every part about that is so unsuitable.
We’ve been disadvantaged of our elementary inalienable God-given rights, our proper to breathe oxygen, for goodness sake, our rights to socialize with our fellow man. We want hugs, we’d like socialization, particularly as creating kids. And that is the place our subsequent degree of litigation goes to take us.”
Garner not too long ago sued the New Mexico Governor, difficult the state of public well being emergency, which is predicated on lies, together with using a mainly meaningless take a look at to diagnose an infection.
“If that PCR test is considered to be the bottom card of this house of cards that we have been dealt, if we pull that out, I think the rest of the house of cards has to collapse,” she says. “And that means that the orders, the mandates, the restrictions that have been put in place as a result of this declaration are all null and void.”
Garner can be submitting a case on behalf of kids, based mostly on a German victory, through which a mom sued, saying forcing her baby to put on a masks at college and through health lessons was baby abuse. The decide agreed, ruling that it constitutes baby abuse and granted injunctive aid. Garner’s case would be the first of that sort within the U.S.
“I am unable to emphasize how a lot that folks must know what their rights are. If they do not know what their rights are, they will proceed giving them up. And that is precisely what they’ve finished. They’ve provided that their proper to breathe.
They’ve given up their proper to have free train of their faith with fellowship and singing, and sitting near individuals within the bench. They have given up their rights to have the ability to assemble with their family and friends in numbers better than 5.
This entire factor is simply insane. And these of us who’re this and going, ‘This is insane,’ want to understand that we are the ones who aren’t insane, and attempt to assist individuals come again to some degree of reasonableness.”
Garner is in want of donations and volunteers, together with courageous, hard-nosed attorneys prepared to battle for the rights and freedoms of Americans, so please donate or signal as much as volunteer on NMstandup.org.
Roundtable 4: Creative Action
In Roundtable 4, beginning across the 2 hour 18-minute mark, Wolfe, Thorton and the Fosters flip to the extra non secular aspect of issues and talk about how we are able to nourish and encourage ourselves and others to take motion on behalf of humanity. Again, I hope you watch this video in its entirety, and share it extensively with everybody you realize. Together, we are able to get by way of this, and, as you possibly can see, you are not alone.