NPR Pharmaceutical Propaganda Disguised as 'Journalism'

May 6, 2021, we obtained an e-mail from Geoff Brumfiel, a senior editor and correspondent with NPR. According to NPR, “his reporting focuses on the intersection of science and national security,”1 however as quickly as I learn the topic line of the e-mail — “The business of anti-vaccine propaganda” [sic] — it was clear that the road of questioning that might observe was not journalism however slightly a PR piece for the pharmaceutical business.

Indeed, Brumfiel’s e-mail didn’t disappoint, nor did his ensuing article, “For Some Anti-Vaccine Advocates, Misinformation Is Part of a Business.”2 True to type for NPR, the article presents a slanted view of vaccine security advocates designed to disparage and discredit those that are talking out in opposition to COVID propaganda.

Conveniently, Brumfiel included just one quick phase from our emailed response to his questions, however uncared for to say NPR’s tight connections with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation — and the a whole bunch of articles NPR has launched which can be extremely favorable towards the Gates Foundation and the work it funds.3

Brumfiel’s Slanderous Allegations

Brumfiel included solely a brief phase of our e-mail alternate in his NPR article, which was that I reject his “biased accusation of promoting misinformation.”4 This is true, but it helps to read it in context. The entire sentence was actually, “Dr. Mercola rejects your biased accusation of promoting misinformation, please provide your direct evidence to support your slanderous allegations.” Those allegations had been made in Brumfiel’s e-mail to us, which learn:

“I’m a reporter with National Public Radio who’s working on a story about the business side of the antivaccine industry. The article describes how the current pandemic has provided an opportunity for people such as Dr. Mercola. By promoting misinformation about the coronavirus and vaccines, they are able to expand their reach and potentially their customer base.”

Yet, NPR’s smear piece reveals what an actual misinformation marketing campaign seems to be like. A real journalist wouldn’t ask loaded questions with no relevance to his said matter and no clarification as to how these questions may match into his matter the best way Brumfiel did. Those questions had been:

“1. Can you present me with any particulars in regards to the measurement of Dr. Mercola’s companies? And have they grown throughout the pandemic?

2. How does he reply to critics who say that he’s utilizing misinformation about vaccines to show individuals away from typical medication and in direction of his manufacturers and merchandise?

3. Is he apprehensive about being deplatformed by social media firms? Would that pose a monetary problem to him?”

Since Brumfiel didn’t embody our response in his article, right here it’s so that you can learn in its entirety:

“Dr. Mercola owns a small enterprise that employs 135 individuals in Cape Coral, Fl. The pharmaceutical business and the propagandists that fund your group with multi-millions are making tens of billions of {dollars} via this pandemic — with full indemnification.5

NPR serves an essential function in pushing the pharmaceutical agenda to advertise necessary vaccination with the assistance of Bill Gates’ funding. You are defending the world’s strongest and corrupt business, whereas attacking a small enterprise that has been preventing in opposition to them and claiming issues in regards to the measurement and development of Dr. Mercola’s enterprise.

The pharmaceutical business is the world’s strongest business, and Bill Gates is among the world’s strongest individuals.6,7,8 Standing up for what is correct and defending free speech is extra essential than complying with any mass media marketing campaign assaults or social media’s political agendas. Your line of questioning just isn’t journalism, it’s simply a part of political bias and pharmaceutical propaganda.”

Gates Foundation Gave $17.5 Million to NPR

Mainstream media is more and more being purchased off by organizations together with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and as a outcome, the bought-and-paid-for press will solely publish articles of their favor.

Writing in Columbia Journalism Review, Tim Schwab examined the recipients of almost 20,000 Gates Foundation grants, discovering greater than $250 million had been given to main media firms, together with BBC, NBC, Al Jazeera, ProfessionalPublica, National Journal, The Guardian and the Center for Investigative Reporting.9

Ironically, “The foundation even helped fund a 2016 report10 from the American Press Institute that was used to develop guidelines11 on how newsrooms can maintain editorial independence from philanthropic funders,” Schwab writes, including, “Gates’s generosity appears to have helped foster an increasingly friendly media environment for the world’s most visible charity.”

And Gates’ donations include strings hooked up. Those given to NPR had been meant to focus on protection of world well being and schooling:12

“When Gates provides cash to newsrooms, it restricts how the cash is used — typically for matters, like international well being and schooling, on which the inspiration works — which will help elevate its agenda within the information media.

For instance, in 2015 Gates gave $383,000 to the Poynter Institute, a widely-cited authority on journalism ethics … earmarking the funds ‘to improve the accuracy in worldwide media of claims related to global health and development.’ Poynter senior vp Kelly McBride stated Gates’s cash was handed on to media fact-checking websites …

Since 2000, the Gates Foundation has given NPR $17.5 million via 10 charitable grants — all of them earmarked for protection of world well being and schooling, particular points on which Gates works …

Even when NPR publishes vital reporting on Gates, it could actually really feel scripted. In February 2018, NPR ran a narrative headlined ‘Bill Gates Addresses ‘Tough Questions’ on Poverty and Power.’ The ‘tough questions’ NPR posed on this Q&A had been principally based mostly on a listing curated by Gates himself, which he beforehand answered in a letter posted to his basis’s web site.”

NPR’s Key Source Is a Digital Hate Group

Brumfiel’s main reference for his NPR hit piece is none apart from Imran Ahmed, who runs the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) — a progressive U.Ok.-based cancel-culture chief13 with intensive ties to authorities and international suppose tanks who has labeled individuals questioning the COVID-19 vaccine as “threats to national security.”

Ahmed has gone on document saying he considers anti-vaxxers “an extremist group that pose a national security risk,”14 and admits monitoring and spying on 425 vaccine-related Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and Twitter accounts.15 CCDH can be partnered with HealthGuard, which is NewsGuard’s health-related service.16

NewsGuard, the self-ascribed arbiter of the trustworthiness of web web sites, is one other menace to the free sharing of information. It claims to fee information as dependable or faux information, supplying you with a color-coded ranking system subsequent to Google and Bing searches, as effectively as on articles displayed on social media.

But NewsGuard is in itself fraught with conflicts of curiosity, as it’s largely funded by Publicis, a world communications big that’s partnered with Big Pharma. NewsGuard beforehand classified as fake news as a result of we reported the SARS-CoV-2 virus as doubtlessly having been leaked from the biosafety level 4 (BSL4) laboratory in Wuhan City, China, the epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Since then, a number of members of the U.S. Congress have vowed to launch their own investigation to discover the lab accident idea.17

Publicis seems to be enjoying an essential function within the international censorship of information regarding COVID-19, and Publicis Health admitted its involvement on this agenda in an April 2021 tweet, during which the they introduced its partnership with NewsGuard, “to fight the ‘infodemic’ of misinformation about COVID-19 and its vaccines.”18

Publicis Health is devoted to suppressing any information that hurts its Big Pharma shoppers, which embody Lilly, Abbot, Roche, Amgen, Genentech, Celgene, Gilead, Biogen, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline and Bayer, simply to call just a few. They’re now being sued by the Massachusetts lawyer basic for his or her function in creating Purdue’s misleading advertising for OxyContin, which is described as the “crime of the century.”

NPR Spreads CCDH’s Hit List

The CCDH revealed a hit-list of 12 groups and individuals it wants Big Tech to bury, deplatform and ban for disseminating COVID-19 information that runs counter to established order propaganda. NPR jumped proper on the bandwagon in spreading this misinformation, with an article titled, “Just 12 People Are Behind Most Vaccine Hoaxes on Social Media, Research Shows.”19

Not surprisingly, is on that listing, and a ramp-up of non-public threats that can’t be defended in opposition to in a court docket of legislation lately pressured me to delete lots of the articles discussing various remedies for COVID-19 from my web site. That article — sarcastically a part of NPR’s particular collection on “untangling disinformation” — is in itself fraught with misinformation, most of it once more being unfold by one particular person — Ahmed — and CCDH.

NPR praises Facebook for blatant censorship, with statements such as, “Facebook said it now limits the reach of posts that could discourage people from getting vaccinated, even if the messages don’t explicitly break its rules. But the cat-and-mouse game continues.”20 Then in case you scroll to the underside, you’ll see the editor’s be aware: “Facebook is among NPR’s financial supporters.”21

Media Is Getting Away With Blatant Lies

Digital dictatorship is escalating, and persons are more and more being conditioned to suppose it’s not solely essential for “misinformation” to be eliminated however that it’s the duty of those important information carriers to take action. is on the hit listing and, as I already stated, a ramp-up of non-public threats that can’t be defended in opposition to in a court docket of legislation lately pressured me to delete lots of the articles discussing various remedies for COVID-19 from my web site.

Censorship extremists have known as this a victory, however it’s nothing of the kind. For occasion, Coda Story revealed a false article May 7, 2021, claiming that “pressure from lawmakers and antidiscrimination groups” prompted me to take away COVID-19 content material from, in an effort to “avoid social media ban.”22

The article quotes Ahmed (discover a sample?) who states, “Joseph Mercola is a superspreader of anti-vaccine and COVID disinformation. The fact that he has said he will self-censor shows the impact of penalizing anti-vaccine propagandists.”23

I truly stopped maintaining an active Facebook page voluntarily in August 2019 because of the firm’s behavior of subverting customers’ privateness. The concept that I’m now self-censoring because of some type of unnamed penalty or to “avoid social media ban” is sort of a stretch, and makes it clear that Ahmed didn’t learn the article I revealed explaining my reasoning for removing select content.

It was additionally implied that I’m a part of an “anti-science movement” — one other lie that’s simply “fact-checked,” contemplating one of many driving forces behind is to share science-backed well being information — together with the science that not everyone wants you to hear.

It’s time to get the phrase out that if you wish to see what an actual misinformation marketing campaign seems to be like, you want look no additional than the mainstream media and social media, that are actively attempting to limit your entry to the reality from web sites like mine.


Source Link –

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

15 − six =

Back to top button