Is Natural Immunity More Effective Than the COVID Shot?

According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention knowledge,1 COVID-19 “cases” have trended downward since peaking throughout the first and second week of January 2021.

covid-19 cases

At first look, this decline seems to be occurring in tandem with the rollout of COVID photographs. January 1, 2021, solely 0.5% of the U.S. inhabitants had acquired a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had acquired a number of photographs,2 and as of July 13, 48.3% had been totally “vaccinated.”3

However, as famous in a July 12, 2021, STAT News article,4 “cases” had began their downward pattern earlier than COVID photographs had been extensively used. “Following patterns from previous pandemics, the precipitous decline in new cases of Covid-19 started well before a meaningful number of people had been vaccinated,” Robert M. Kaplan, Professor Emeritus at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, writes. He continues:

“Nearly 50 years in the past, medical sociologists John and Sonja McKinlay examined5 demise charges from 10 critical ailments: tuberculosis, scarlet fever, influenzae, pneumonia, diphtheria, whooping cough, measles, smallpox, typhoid, and polio. In every case, the new remedy or vaccine credited with overcoming it was launched effectively after the illness was in decline.

More not too long ago, historian Thomas McKeown famous6 that deaths from bronchitis, pneumonia, and influenza had begun quickly falling 35 years earlier than the introduction of latest medicines that had been credited with their conquest. These historic analyses are related to the present pandemic.”

‘Case’ Decline Preceded Widespread Implementation of Jab

As famous by Kaplan, COVID-19 “cases” peaked in early January 2021. January 8, greater than 300,000 new optimistic take a look at outcomes had been recorded each day. By February 21, that had declined to a day by day new case rely of 55,000. COVID-19 gene modification injections had been granted emergency use authorization at the finish of December 2020, however by February 21, solely 5.9% of American adults had been totally vaccinated with two doses.

Despite such a low vaccination charge, new “cases” had declined by 82%. Considering well being authorities declare we’d like 70% of Americans vaccinated so as to obtain herd immunity and cease the unfold of this virus, this merely is not sensible. Clearly, the COVID photographs had nothing to do with the decline in optimistic take a look at outcomes.

To be clear, reported instances imply optimistic take a look at outcomes, and we now know the overwhelming majority of optimistic PCR checks have been, and nonetheless are, false positives. They’re not sick. They merely had a false “positive.” Right now, we’re additionally confronted with yet one more state of affairs that complicates makes an attempt at knowledge evaluation, and Kaplan understandably didn’t tackle any of those confounding components.

But simply so that you’re conscious, you probably have been totally “vaccinated,” then the CDC recommends operating the PCR take a look at at a cycle threshold (CT) of 28 or decrease, which dramatically lowers your probability of a false optimistic consequence, however if you’re unvaccinated, the PCR take a look at is advisable to be run at a CT of 40 or increased, nearly guaranteeing a false optimistic.

This is only one method by which the CDC is manipulating knowledge to make the COVID photographs seem more practical than they’re. This additionally permits them to falsely declare that the overwhelming majority of latest instances are amongst the unvaccinated.

Naturally, if unvaccinated are examined in such a method as to maximise false positives, then they’re going to make up the bulk of the so-called caseload. In actuality, although, the overwhelming majority of them aren’t sick.

Meanwhile, those that have acquired the jabs solely rely as a COVID case in the event that they’re hospitalized and/or die with a optimistic take a look at consequence. These extensively differing testing methods skew the knowledge and permit for false interpretations to be made.

Natural Immunity Explains Decline in Cases

As famous by Kaplan, the most affordable clarification for declining charges of SARS-CoV-2 seems to be pure immunity from earlier infections, which fluctuate significantly from state to state.7 He goes on to quote a research8 by the National Institutes of Health, which suggests SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was 4.8 occasions increased than beforehand thought, due to undiagnosed an infection.

In different phrases, they declare that for each reported optimistic take a look at consequence, there have been probably practically 5 further individuals who had the an infection however didn’t get a analysis. To analyze this knowledge additional, Kaplan calculated the pure immunity charge by dividing the new estimated variety of folks naturally contaminated by the inhabitants of any given state. He writes:9

“By mid-February 2021, an estimated 150 million folks in the U.S. (30 million occasions 5) could have had been contaminated with SARS-CoV-2. By April, I estimated the pure immunity charge to be above 55% in 10 states: Arizona, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin.

At the different finish of the continuum, I estimated the pure immunity charge to be beneath 35% in the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington …

By the finish of 2020, new infections had been already quickly declining in practically all of the 10 states the place the majority could have had pure immunity, effectively earlier than greater than a minuscule proportion of Americans had been totally vaccinated. In 80% of those states, the day when new instances had been at their peak occurred earlier than vaccines had been obtainable.

In distinction, the 10 states with decrease charges of earlier infections had been more likely to expertise new upticks in Covid-19 instances in March and April … By the finish of May, states with fewer new infections had considerably decrease vaccination charges than states with extra new infections.”

COVID Shots Cannot Eliminate COVID-19

So, SARS-CoV-2 instances had been really increased in states the place pure immunity was low however vaccination charges had been excessive. Meanwhile, in states the place pure immunity as a result of undiagnosed publicity was excessive, however vaccination charges had been low, the day by day new caseload was additionally decrease.

This is sensible if pure immunity is extremely efficient (which, traditionally it has at all times been and there’s no purpose to suspect SARS-CoV-2 is any totally different in that regard). It additionally is sensible if the COVID photographs aren’t actually providing any important safety in opposition to an infection, which we additionally know is the case.

Vaccine producers have already admitted these COVID photographs won’t present immunity, which means they won’t forestall you from being contaminated. The concept behind these gene modification injections is that if/once you do get contaminated, you’ll hopefully expertise milder signs, although you’re nonetheless infectious and might unfold the virus to others.

Kaplan ends his evaluation by saying that COVID photographs are a safer option to obtain herd immunity, and that they’re “the best tool available for assuring that the smoldering fire of [COVID-19] is extinguished.” I disagree, primarily based on two main points.

First, and maybe most significantly, that is an untested “vaccine” and we don’t know of the short-term not to mention long-term harm it’s going to trigger, as any affordable effort at amassing this knowledge has been actively suppressed. Secondly, the survivability of COVID-19 exterior of nursing properties is 99.74%. If you’re underneath the age of 40, your probability of surviving a bout of COVID-19 is 99.99%.10,11,12

You can’t actually enhance your possibilities of surviving past that, so COVID photographs can not realistically finish the pandemic. Meanwhile, the COVID photographs include an ever-growing checklist of potential unintended effects that may take years if not a long time off your pure life span. The photographs are notably pointless for anybody with pure immunity,13 but that’s what the CDC recommends.14

Why Push COVID Jab on Those with Natural Immunity?

In January 2021, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, a cardiac surgeon and affected person advocate, despatched a public letter15 to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration commissioner detailing the dangers of vaccinating people who’ve beforehand been contaminated with SARS-CoV-2, or who’ve an lively SARS-CoV-2 an infection.

He urged the FDA to require prescreening for SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins to cut back the threat of accidents and deaths following vaccination, as the vaccine could set off an hostile immune response in those that have already been contaminated with the virus. In March 2021, Fox TV host Tucker Carlson interviewed him about these dangers. In that interview, Noorchashm mentioned:16

“I feel it’s a dramatic error on a part of public well being officers to attempt to put this vaccine right into a one-size-fits-all paradigm … We’re going to take this drawback we’ve with the COVID-19 pandemic, the place a half-percent of the inhabitants is vulnerable to dying, and compound it by inflicting completely avoidable hurt by vaccinating people who find themselves already contaminated …

The sign is deafening, the people who find themselves having problems or hostile occasions are the individuals who have not too long ago or are at present or beforehand contaminated [with COVID]. I don’t assume we will ignore this.”

In an electronic mail to The Defender, Noorchashm fleshed out his considerations, saying:17

“Viral antigens persist in the tissues of the naturally infected for months. When the vaccine is used too early after a natural infection, or worse during an active infection, the vaccine force activates a powerful immune response that attacks the tissues where the natural viral antigens are persisting. This, I suggest, is the cause of the high level of adverse events and, likely deaths, we are seeing in the recently infected following vaccination.”

Despite being extensively ignored, Noorchashm continues to push for the implementation of prevaccine screening utilizing PCR or speedy antigen testing to find out whether or not the particular person has an lively an infection, and an IgG antibody take a look at to find out previous an infection.

If both take a look at is optimistic, he recommends delaying vaccination for no less than three to 6 months to permit your IgG ranges to wane. At that time, he recommends testing your blood IgG degree and use that as a information to determine the timing of your vaccination.

Those with Natural Immunity Have Higher Risk of Side Effects

Mere weeks after Noorchashm’s letter to the FDA, a world survey18 confirmed his considerations. After surveying 2,002 individuals who had acquired a primary dose of COVID-19 vaccine, they discovered that those that had beforehand had COVID-19 skilled “significantly increased incidence and severity” of unintended effects, in comparison with those that didn’t have pure immunity.

The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines had been linked to a better incidence of unintended effects in comparison with the viral vector-based COVID-19 vaccines, however tended to be milder, native reactions. Systemic reactions, equivalent to anaphylaxis, flu-like sickness and breathlessness, had been extra prone to happen with the viral vector COVID-19 vaccines.

Like Noorchashm earlier than them, the researchers known as on well being officers to reevaluate their vaccination suggestions for individuals who’ve had COVID-19:19

“People with prior COVID-19 publicity had been largely excluded from the vaccine trials and, consequently, the security and reactogenicity of the vaccines on this inhabitants haven’t been beforehand totally evaluated. For the first time, this research demonstrates a major affiliation between prior COVID19 an infection and a considerably increased incidence and severity of self-reported unintended effects after vaccination for COVID-19.

Consistently, in comparison with the first dose of the vaccine, we discovered an elevated incidence and severity of self-reported unintended effects after the second dose, when recipients had been beforehand uncovered to viral antigen.

In view of the quickly accumulating knowledge demonstrating that COVID-19 survivors usually have satisfactory pure immunity for not less than 6 months, it could be applicable to re-evaluate the suggestion for speedy vaccination of this group.”

CDC Misrepresents Data to Push Jab on Those with Immunity

So far, the CDC has refused to alter its stance on the matter. Instead, officers at the company appear to have doubled down and truly exit of their option to misrepresent knowledge in an effort to harass these with pure immunity to inappropriately take the jab, which is clearly clinically pointless.

In a report issued by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) December 18, 2020, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was mentioned to have “consistent high efficacy” of 92% or extra amongst folks with proof of earlier SARS-CoV-2 an infection.20

After taking a look at the Pfizer trial knowledge, Rep. Thomas Massie — a Republican Congressman for Kentucky and an award-winning scientist in his personal proper — found that’s fully improper. In a January 30, 2021, Full Measure report, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson described how Massie tried, in useless, to get the CDC to appropriate its error. According to Massie:21,22

“There isn’t any efficacy demonstrated in the Pfizer trial amongst contributors with proof of earlier SARS-CoV-2 infections and truly there is no proof in the Moderna trial both …

It [the CDC report] says the precise reverse of what the knowledge says. They’re giving folks the impression that this vaccine will save your life, or prevent from struggling, even in case you’ve already had the virus and recovered, which has not been demonstrated in both the Pfizer or the Moderna trial.”

After a number of cellphone calls, CDC deputy director Dr. Anne Schuchat lastly acknowledged the error and advised Massie it could be fastened. “As you note correctly, there is not sufficient analysis to show that in the subset of only the people with prior infection, there’s efficacy. So, you’re correct that that sentence is wrong and that we need to make a correction of it,” Schuchat mentioned in the recorded name.

January 29, 2021, the CDC issued its supposed correction, however quite than repair the error, they merely rephrased the mistake otherwise. This was the “correction” they issued:

“Consistent high efficacy (≥92%) was observed across age, sex, race, and ethnicity categories and among persons with underlying medical conditions. Efficacy was similarly high in a secondary analysis including participants both with or without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

As you possibly can see, the “correction” nonetheless misleadingly means that vaccination is efficient for these beforehand contaminated, although the knowledge confirmed no such factor. Children of ever-younger ages are additionally being pushed to get the COVID jab, although they’ve the absolute lowest threat of dying from COVID-19 of any group.

Data23 from the first 12 months of the pandemic in the U.Okay. present simply 25 folks underneath the age of 18 died from or with COVID-19.24 In all, 251 youngsters underneath 18 had been admitted to intensive care between March 2020 and February 2021. The absolute threat of demise from COVID-19 in youngsters is 2 in 1 million.

Vaccine Provides Far Less Protection Than Natural Immunity

While some declare vaccine-induced immunity affords better safety in opposition to SARS-CoV-2 an infection than pure immunity, historic and present real-world knowledge merely fail to assist this non-common sense assertion.

As not too long ago reported by Attkisson25,26 and David Rosenberg 7 Israeli National News,27 latest Israeli knowledge present those that have acquired the COVID jab are 6.72 occasions extra prone to get contaminated than individuals who have recovered from pure an infection.

Among the 7,700 new COVID instances recognized thus far throughout the present wave of infections that started in May 2021, 39% had been vaccinated (about 3,000 instances), 1% (72 sufferers) had recovered from a earlier SARS-CoV-2 an infection and 60% had been neither vaccinated nor beforehand contaminated. Israeli National News notes:28

“With a complete of 835,792 Israelis identified to have recovered from the virus, the 72 cases of reinfection quantity to 0.0086% of people that had been already contaminated with COVID.

By distinction, Israelis who had been vaccinated had been 6.72 occasions extra prone to get contaminated after the shot than after pure an infection, with over 3,000 of the 5,193,499, or 0.0578%, of Israelis who had been vaccinated getting contaminated in the newest wave.”

Breakthrough Infections Are on the Rise

Other Israeli knowledge additionally recommend the restricted safety provided by the COVID shot is quickly eroding. August 1, 2021, director of Israel’s Public Health Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, introduced half of all COVID-19 infections had been amongst the totally vaccinated.29 Signs of extra critical illness amongst totally vaccinated are additionally rising, she mentioned, notably in these over the age of 60.

Even worse, August 5, Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely unwell COVID-19 sufferers are totally vaccinated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of COVID-related hospitalizations general.30

Other areas the place a transparent majority of residents have been vaccinated are additionally seeing spikes in breakthrough instances. In Gibraltar, which has a 99% COVID jab compliance charge, COVID instances have risen by 2,500% since June 1, 2021.31

US Outbreak Shatters ‘Pandemic of Unvaccinated’ Narrative

An investigation by the CDC32,33 additionally dispels the narrative that we’re in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” An outbreak in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, resulted in 469 new COVID instances amongst residents who had traveled into city between July 3 and July 17, 2021.

Of these instances, 74% had been totally vaccinated, as had been 80% of these requiring hospitalization.Most, however not all, had the Delta variant of the virus. The CDC additionally discovered that totally vaccinated people who contract the an infection had as excessive a viral load of their nasal passages as unvaccinated people who acquired contaminated.34 This means the vaccinated are simply as infectious as the unvaccinated. According to Attkisson:35

“CDC’s latest findings on so-called ‘breakthrough’ infections in vaccinated individuals are mirrored by different knowledge releases. Illinois well being officers not too long ago introduced36 greater than 160 fully-vaccinated folks have died of Covid-19, and not less than 644 been hospitalized; 10 deaths and 51 hospitalizations counted in the prior week …

In July, New Jersey reported 49 totally vaccinated residents had died of Covid; 27 in Louisiana; 80 in Massachusetts … Nationally, as of July 12, CDC mentioned it was conscious of greater than 4,400 individuals who acquired Covid-19 after being totally vaccinated and needed to be hospitalized; and 1,063 totally vaccinated individuals who died of Covid.”

It is essential to notice this knowledge is over 1 month previous now and it’s probably that many 1000’s of totally “vaccinated” have now died from COVID-19.

Natural Immunity Appears Robust and Long-Lasting

An argument we’re beginning to hear extra of now’s that although pure immunity after restoration from an infection seems to be fairly good, “we don’t know how long it’ll last.” This is quite disingenuous, seeing how pure immunity is often lifelong, and research have proven pure immunity in opposition to SARS-CoV-2 is at naked minimal longer lasting than vaccine-induced immunity.

Here’s a sampling of scholarly publications which have investigated pure immunity because it pertains to SARS-CoV-2 an infection. There are a number of extra along with these:37

Science Immunology October 202038 discovered that “RBD-targeted antibodies are excellent markers of previous and recent infection, that differential isotype measurements can help distinguish between recent and older infections, and that IgG responses persist over the first few months after infection and are highly correlated with neutralizing antibodies.”

The BMJ January 202139 concluded that “Of 11, 000 health care workers who had proved evidence of infection during the first wave of the pandemic in the U.K. between March and April 2020, none had symptomatic reinfection in the second wave of the virus between October and November 2020.”

Science February 202140 reported that “Substantial immune reminiscence is generated after COVID-19, involving all 4 main sorts of immune reminiscence [antibodies, memory B cells, memory CD8+ T cells, and memory CD4+ T cells]. About 95% of topics retained immune reminiscence at ~6 months after an infection. Circulating antibody titers weren’t predictive of T cell reminiscence.

Thus, easy serological checks for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies don’t mirror the richness and sturdiness of immune reminiscence to SARS-CoV-2.” A 2,800-person research discovered no symptomatic reinfections over a ~118-day window, and a 1,246-person research noticed no symptomatic reinfections over 6 months.

A February 2021 research posted on the prepublication server medRxiv41 concluded that “Natural infection appears to elicit strong protection against reinfection with an efficacy ~95% for at least seven months.”

An April 2021 research posted on medRxiv42 reported “the overall estimated level of protection from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for documented infection is 94.8%; hospitalization 94.1%; and severe illness 96·4%. Our results question the need to vaccinate previously-infected individuals.”

Another April 2021 research posted on the preprint server BioRxiv43 concluded that “following a typical case of mild COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells not only persist but continuously differentiate in a coordinated fashion well into convalescence, into a state characteristic of long-lived, self-renewing memory.”

A May 2020 report in the journal Immunity44 confirmed that SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies are detected in COVID-19 convalescent topics, in addition to mobile immune responses. Here, they discovered that neutralizing antibody titers do correlate with the variety of virus-specific T cells.

A May 2021 Nature article45 discovered SARS-CoV-2 an infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells, that are an important supply of protecting antibodies. Even after delicate an infection, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies had been detectable past 11 months’ post-infection.

A May 2021 research in E Clinical Medicine46 discovered “antibody detection is possible for almost a year post-natural infection of COVID-19.” According to the authors, “Based on current evidence, we hypothesize that antibodies to both S and N-proteins after natural infection may persist for longer than previously thought, thereby providing evidence of sustainability that may influence post-pandemic planning.”

Cure-Hub knowledge47 affirm that whereas COVID photographs can generate increased antibody ranges than pure an infection, this doesn’t imply vaccine-induced immunity is extra protecting. Importantly, pure immunity confers a lot wider safety as your physique acknowledges all 5 proteins of the virus and never only one. With the COVID shot, your physique solely acknowledges certainly one of these proteins, the spike protein.

A June 2021 Nature article48 factors out that “Wang et al. present that, between 6 and 12 months after an infection, the focus of neutralizing antibodies stays unchanged. That the acute immune response extends even past six months is usually recommended by the authors’ evaluation of SARS-CoV-2-specific reminiscence B cells in the blood of the convalescent people over the course of the 12 months.

These reminiscence B cells constantly improve the reactivity of their SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies by a course of often known as somatic hypermutation. The excellent news is that the proof up to now predicts that an infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces long-term immunity in most people.”

Another June Nature paper concluded that “In the absence of vaccination antibody reactivity [to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2], neutralizing activity and the number of RBD-specific memory B cells remain relatively stable from 6 to 12 months.” According to the authors, the knowledge recommend “immunity in convalescent individuals will be very long lasting.”

What Makes Natural Immunity Superior?

The purpose pure immunity is superior to vaccine-induced immunity is as a result of viruses include 5 totally different proteins. The COVID shot induces antibodies in opposition to simply a type of proteins, the spike protein, and no T cell immunity. When you’re contaminated with the complete virus, you develop antibodies in opposition to all components of the virus, plus reminiscence T cells.

This additionally means pure immunity affords higher safety in opposition to variants, because it acknowledges a number of components of the virus. If there are important alternations to the spike protein, as with the Delta variant, vaccine-induced immunity may be evaded. Not so with pure immunity, as the different proteins are nonetheless acknowledged and attacked.

Not solely that however the COVID jabs really actively promote the manufacturing of variants for which they supply nearly no safety in any respect, whereas these with pure immunity don’t trigger variants and are practically universally protected in opposition to them.

If we’re to rely on vaccine-induced immunity, as public well being officers are urging us to do, we’ll find yourself on a unending booster treadmill. Boosters will completely be vital, as the shot affords such slim safety in opposition to a single protein of the virus. Already, Moderna has publicly said that the want for extra boosters is predicted.49

Ultimately It’s About Wealth Transfer, Power and Control

Government businesses sometimes don’t challenge suggestions with out ulterior motives. Since present suggestions make completely no sense from a medical and scientific standpoint, what would possibly the purpose be for these illogical and reprehensibly unethical suggestions to inject individuals who don’t want it with experimental gene modification expertise?

Why are they so hell-bent on getting a needle in each arm? And why are they refusing to carry out any type of risk-benefit evaluation?

Data already point out these COVID-19 injections could possibly be the most harmful medical product we’ve ever seen, and a June 24, 2021, peer-reviewed research printed in the medical journal Vaccines warned we’re actually killing practically as many with the photographs as would die from COVID-19 itself.50

Using knowledge from a big Israeli discipline research and two European drug reactions databases, they recalculated the NNTV for Pfizer’s mRNA shot. To forestall one case of COVID-19, wherever between 200 and 700 needed to be injected. To forestall a single demise, the NNTV was between 9,000 and 50,000, with 16,000 as some extent estimate.

Meanwhile, the variety of folks reporting hostile reactions from the photographs was 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. For critical unintended effects, there have been 16 experiences per 100,000 vaccinations, and the variety of deadly unintended effects was 4.11 per 100,000 vaccinations.

The last calculation prompt that for each three COVID-19 deaths prevented, two died from the photographs. “This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy,” the authors concluded.

As has turn out to be the pattern, a letter expressing “concern” about the research was printed June 28, 2021, leading to the paper being abruptly retracted July 2, 2021, in opposition to the authors’ objections. They disagreed with the accusation that their knowledge and subsequent conclusion had been misrepresentative, however the paper was retracted earlier than that they had time to publish a rebuttal.

Based on all the things we’ve found thus far, it appears a pandemic virus industrial complicated is operating the present, with a purpose to remove medical rights and private freedoms so as to centralize energy, management and wealth.

By the seems of issues, the COVID-19 mass psychosis and lack of any rational considering by practically half the inhabitants will proceed to persist so long as the propaganda continues. Fear will proceed and if want be, different engineered viruses could also be launched, for which they’ll create much more gene modification injections.

I consider the reality will finally be so overwhelming, it’ll sweep away the confusion and the lies.


Source Link –

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

13 + sixteen =

Back to top button