While the two at present obtainable COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. are based mostly on novel mRNA expertise — which in reality are experimental gene therapies, not true vaccines — the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is a bit completely different. It makes use of a chimpanzee adenovirus vector genetically engineered to precise the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as a substitute.
In the video above, James Corbett of The Corbett Report interviews1 Whitney Webb, a author and researcher who covers intelligence, Big Tech, surveillance and civil liberties, about a few of the primary variations between these vaccines.
They then delve into the curious ties between Oxford University, AstraZeneca and the British eugenics motion — a subject Webb lined in her in-depth December 26, 2020, investigative report “Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to U.K. Eugenics Movement,”2 co-written with Jeremy Loffredo.
The Corbett Report interview and this text provide solely a cursory abstract of the findings in that report, so I extremely advocate studying Webb’s unique article for a extra detailed view.
The Not for Profit Myth
Webb factors out that one in every of the causes the AstraZeneca vaccine is being promoted for growing nations is as a result of it would not require the deep-freeze chilly storage that mRNA vaccines do, so the logistics surrounding distribution are far much less cumbersome and sophisticated. As a consequence, GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, has partnered with AstraZeneca to convey the vaccine to the growing world, together with Africa3 and Egypt.4
Now, whereas AstraZeneca has promised it is not going to make any revenue from its vaccine, there is a time restrict on this pledge that the majority media pundits fail to notice. The not-for-profit vow expires as soon as the pandemic is over, and AstraZeneca itself seems to have a say in terms of declaring the finish date. It could possibly be as early as July 1, 2021, in keeping with an organization memo obtained by the Financial Times.5
As defined by Webb, the patents and royalties for the AstraZeneca vaccine are held by a personal firm referred to as Vaccitech, the buyers of which embrace BRAAVOS (a capital funding firm arrange by a Deutche Bank government), Google Ventures, the Wellcome Trust, the Chinese department of Sequoia Capital, the Chinese drug firm Fosun Pharma and the British authorities.
All of those buyers stand to revenue from this vaccine sooner or later in the close to future, and Vaccitech has been fairly open about the future revenue potential with its shareholders, noting that the COVID-19 vaccine will almost definitely turn into an annual vaccine that’s up to date every season very like the seasonal flu vaccine.
In her article, Webb quotes Vaccitech’s CEO Bill Enright, who promised that buyers will obtain “a big chunk of the royalties from a successful vaccine as well as ‘milestone’ payments if and when the pandemic is declared over and COVID-19 vaccines become a seasonal event.”6
Mapping the Players
The precise developer of the vaccine, Webb explains, is the Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research, based in 1995 as a public-private partnership between GlaxoSmithKline and the British authorities.
After just a few years, a reorganization happened, turning the Jenner Institute right into a partnership between the University of Oxford and the Pirbright Institute (beforehand often called the Institute for Animal Health). The Jenner Institute can be a part of the Oxford Vaccine Group.
The AstraZeneca vaccine has additionally obtained U.S. funding. In 2020, the firm obtained $1 billion in funding for its COVID-19 vaccine from the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), which is a part of the Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is amongst those that have promoted the concept that the COVID-19 vaccine might want to turn into an annual inoculation, which can permit Vaccitech and its buyers to massively revenue effectively into the future.
Among the profiteers shall be The Wellcome Trust7 which, like different Vaccitech buyers, is a part of the technocratic globalist network. Wellcome is the largest charity in the U.Ok. that funds “innovative biomedical research.” It was shaped in 1936 after the dying of Sir Henry Wellcome, a pharmaceutical pioneer and progressive industrialist.
Their board consists of current or former bankers, insurance coverage executives and funding board members. Sir Henry Wellcome, whereas nonetheless alive, based the firm that went on to turn into GlaxoSmithKline, so the Wellcome Trust is actually the “philanthropic arm” of GSK.
Adrian Hill’s Ties to Eugenics
Adrian Hill is the director of the Jenner Institute and was a lead developer of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Hill additionally heads the U.Ok. Vaccine Network, a authorities entity that decides the place to funnel funding and vaccine expertise.
One of Hill’s bosses early on in his profession, and his thesis adviser when he was a doctoral scholar, was the late David Weatherall, founding father of the Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, a analysis institute at the University of Oxford.
Weatherall was a member of the Galton Institute from a time when it was often called the U.Ok. Eugenics Society, and he remained a member till his dying in 2018. Hill gave a lecture at Galton in 2008 for its 100-year anniversary. As famous in Webb’s article:8
“Arguably most troubling of all is the direct hyperlink of the vaccine’s lead builders to the Wellcome Trust and, in the case of Adrian Hill, the Galton Institute, two teams with longstanding ties to the UK eugenics motion.
The latter group, named for the ‘father of eugenics’ Francis Galton, is the renamed U.Ok. Eugenics Society, a bunch infamous for over a century for its promotion of racist pseudoscience and efforts to ‘enhance racial inventory’ by decreasing the inhabitants of these deemed inferior.
The ties of Adrian Hill to the Galton Institute ought to elevate apparent considerations given the push to make the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine he developed with [Sarah] Gilbert the vaccine of selection for the growing world, notably nations in Latin America, South and Southeast Asia, and Africa, the very areas the place the Galton Institute’s previous members have referred to as for decreasing inhabitants progress …
While the Galton Institute has tried to distance itself from its previous of selling racial eugenics with surface-level public relations efforts, it has not stopped members of the family of the notorious racist from attaining management positions at the institute.
Emeritus professor of molecular genetics at the Galton Institute and one in every of its officers is none apart from David J. Galton, whose work consists of ‘Eugenics: The Future of Human Life in the twenty first Century.’
David Galton has written that the Human Genome Mapping Project, initially dreamt up by Galton’s former president Walter Bodmer, had ‘enormously elevated … the scope for eugenics … due to the growth of a really highly effective expertise for the manipulation of DNA.’
This new ‘wider definition of eugenics,’ Galton has mentioned, ‘would cowl strategies of regulating inhabitants numbers in addition to bettering genome high quality by selective synthetic insemination by donor, gene remedy or gene manipulation of germ-line cells.’ In increasing on this new definition, Galton is impartial as to ‘whether or not some strategies ought to be made obligatory by the state, or left solely to the private selection of the particular person.'”
Hill and the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics
Hill additionally holds a senior place at the Wellcome Trust’s Centre for Human Genetics. One of his former college students there was Sarah Gilbert, who served as program director for the Centre. Gilbert can be co-founder of Vaccitech and a lead researcher on the COVID-19 vaccine together with Hill.
At the Centre for Human Genetics, Hill’s focus has been “population genetics and race, particularly in Africa” Webb explains. In normal phrases, the Centre investigates race genetics and susceptibility to ailments and infertility. Hill’s specialty is genetics and respiratory diseases. The Wellcome Trust can be the archivist for the Eugenics Society, now the Galton Institute. Webb writes:9
“The crossroads between race and genes is vital in the middle’s work, as a whole working group at the middle, the Myers Group, is devoted to mapping the ‘genetic impacts of migration occasions.’
The middle additionally funded a paper that argued that as long as eugenics shouldn’t be coercive it is a suitable coverage initiative. The paper asks, ‘Is the incontrovertible fact that an motion or coverage is a case of eugenics essentially a motive to not do it?’
According to Hill’s web page on the Wellcome Trust web site, race and genetics have lengthy performed a central position in his scientific method, and his group at present focuses on the position genetics performs in African populations with regard to susceptibility to particular infectious ailments.”
As famous by Webb in her interview, eugenics by no means actually disappeared. It was merely rebranded into extra acceptable phrases revolving round “public health.” This raises all types of questions, beginning with: Why is the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, which has such robust eugenics ties, being earmarked for and marketed particularly to growing nations?
Anti-Racism Agenda, or Eugenics?
Webb additionally factors out how so-called “woke vaccine policy” is utilizing systemic racism as a justification for ensuring the COVID-19 vaccine is given to minorities first.
Such justifications turn into all the extra questionable if not outright suspicious in mild of the eugenics angle, which tends to be closely targeted on decreasing populations of Blacks and numerous native teams.
In the case of the AstraZeneca vaccine, Webb suspects there’s an ulterior revenue motive behind its not-for-profit pledge to growing nations. If the vaccine finally ends up being an annual inoculation, they could insist you retain getting the similar model. This approach, if AstraZeneca finally ends up getting a majority share of the market from the begin, Vaccitech and its buyers will finally reap the biggest income in years to come back.
But along with the revenue angle, there’s additionally the chance that they may alter the vaccine at any level in the future to suit the eugenics agenda, and nobody can be the wiser. As famous by Webb in her article:10
“There are plans in place to train what might fairly be described as financial coercion to stress folks to ‘voluntarily’ get vaccinated. Such coercion shall be clearly be simpler on poor and dealing communities, that means communities of shade shall be disproportionately affected as effectively.
Considering these info, and the case for scrutinizing the security of Oxford-AstraZeneca’s ‘inexpensive’ vaccine choice made above, any hurt brought on by vaccine allocation coverage in the U.S. and past is prone to disproportionately have an effect on poor communities, particularly communities of shade.
As such, the public ought to take all vaccine rollout coverage assertions with a grain of salt, even once they come cloaked in language of inclusion, racial justice, and public well being preservation.
As the cofounder of the American Eugenics Society (later renamed Society for the Study of Social Biology) Frederick Osborn put it in 1968, ‘Eugenic targets are almost definitely to be attained beneath a reputation apart from eugenics.'”
Africans Leery of AstraZeneca’s ‘Gift’
Considering the historical past of Big Pharma utilizing Blacks as guinea pigs, each in Africa and the U.S., it isn’t stunning that Africans are leery about the reward of COVID-19 vaccines. As only one instance, a 2009 Jenner Institute vaccine trial in South Africa killed seven infants. In her article, Webb writes:11
“An investigation performed by the British Medical Journal discovered that the Hill-led Jenner Institute had … knowingly misled mother and father about the unfavourable outcomes of and questionable strategies utilized in animal research as effectively the vaccine being recognized to be ineffective.
The vaccine in query, an experimental tuberculosis vaccine developed collectively by Emergent Biosolutions and the Jenner Institute, was scrapped after the controversial examine in infants confirmed what was already recognized, that the vaccine was ineffective.”
As reported by the Inquirer in the video under, concern amongst South Africans has been so widespread that the South African authorities, in early February 2021, briefly paused its rollout of the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Google Ventures’ Conflict of Interest
As talked about earlier, Google Ventures is one other investor in Vaccitech. Considering Google has a vested stake in the success of a COVID-19 vaccine, its coverage to censor “vaccine misinformation” is a transparent battle of curiosity that they actually ought to be held accountable for, Webb says.
Indeed, it is mindless that Google, which stands to revenue from a COVID-19 vaccine, is allowed to suppress reporting on it. Disturbingly, Webb factors out that, so far as she might inform, she’s the just one who has identified this hyperlink between Google and the AstraZeneca vaccine.
The Gates Foundation
Not surprisingly, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation can be discovered on this net of eugenics. Webb writes:12
“The Wellcome Centre recurrently cofunds the analysis and growth of vaccines and contraception strategies with the Gates Foundation, a basis that actively and admittedly engages in inhabitants and reproductive management in Africa and South Asia by, amongst different issues, prioritizing the widespread distribution of injectable long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs).
The Wellcome Trust has additionally immediately funded research that sought to develop strategies to ‘enhance uptake’ of LARCs in locations akin to rural Rwanda. As researcher Jacob Levich wrote in the ‘Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism,’ LARCs afford ladies in the Global South ‘the least selection doable wanting precise sterilization.’
Some LARCs can render ladies infertile for so long as 5 years, and, as Levich argues, they ‘depart way more management in the arms of suppliers, and fewer in the arms of girls, than condoms, oral contraceptives, or conventional strategies.’ One instance is Norplant, a contraceptive implant manufactured by Schering (now Bayer) that may forestall being pregnant for as much as 5 years.
It was taken off the U.S. market in 2002 after greater than 50,000 ladies filed lawsuits towards the firm and the docs who prescribed it. Seventy of these class motion fits had been associated to negative effects akin to melancholy, excessive nausea, scalp-hair loss, ovarian cysts, migraines, and extreme bleeding.
Slightly modified and rebranded as Jadelle, the harmful drug was promoted in Africa by the Gates Foundation along with USAID and EngenderHealth. Formerly named the Sterilization League for Human Betterment, EngenderHealth’s unique mission, impressed by racial eugenics, was to ‘enhance the organic inventory of the human race.'”
Are Any of the COVID Vaccines Safe?
I’ve written many articles detailing the potential and suspected, if not inevitable, issues with COVID-19 vaccines, primarily the mRNA gene therapies since they’re the two at present in use in the U.S. You can discover all of them utilizing the search bar at the high of this web page.
In addition to their excessive threat of allergic reactions, there’s compelling proof to recommend they could set off extreme inflammation and immune dysregulation. Many scientists are additionally warning of the chance for pathogenic priming and antibody-dependent enhancement, which can make subsequent an infection with a coronavirus way more harmful than had been you not vaccinated.
In a paper13 titled, “COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease,” revealed in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Dr. Bart Classen additionally warns there are additionally troubling evidences suggesting a few of the mRNA pictures could trigger prion ailments akin to Alzheimer’s and ALS.
Meanwhile, Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric rheumatologist specializing in multisystem inflammatory syndrome, has expressed concern about mRNA vaccines’ potential to trigger “microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in safety trials.”14
Around the world, stories are actually additionally pouring in of individuals dying shortly after receiving these COVID-19 vaccines.15,16,17,18,19,20 In many instances, they die all of a sudden inside hours of getting the shot. In others, dying happens inside the span of a few weeks.
As of February 12, 2021, the variety of negative effects reported to VAERS totaled 15,923, together with 929 deaths.21 Pfizer’s vaccine has up to now been liable for 58% of deaths in the U.S. VAERS checklist, whereas Moderna’s vaccine accounts for 41%.
As of March 11, 2021, Denmark, Norway, Iceland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Luxembourg have all suspended the use of AstraZeneca’s vaccine, both in full or partly, following stories of blood clots.22
Austria has additionally suspended a specific batch of AstraZeneca’s vaccine with a view to full an investigation into the dying of a 49-year-old lady who all of a sudden developed a extreme coagulation dysfunction.23
Another Austrian vaccine recipient, a 35-year-old lady, developed acute lung illness from a dislodged blood clot. The similar vaccine batch had reportedly been utilized in Denmark, the place a 60-year-old lady died from a blood clot. According to a March 2, 2021, report24 by The Defender, U.Ok. information present the AstraZeneca vaccine has 77% extra hostile occasions and 25% extra deaths than the Pfizer vaccine.
To keep away from changing into a tragic statistic, I urge you to evaluation the science very fastidiously earlier than making up your thoughts about this experimental remedy. Also keep in mind that the lethality of COVID-19 is definitely surprisingly low. It’s decrease than the flu for these beneath the age of 60.25
If you’re beneath the age of 40, your threat of dying from COVID-19 is simply 0.01%, that means you’ve a 99.99% likelihood of surviving the an infection. And you may enhance that to 99.999% in case you’re metabolically versatile, insulin delicate, and vitamin D replete.