Death knell for Chinese crypto miners? Rigs on the move after gov’t crackdown


When it involves China, few issues are crystal clear, and the nation’s recent crackdown on crypto mining isn’t any exception. The State Council’s Financial Stability and Development Committee reported on May 21 that it’s curbing Bitcoin (BTC) mining amid monetary danger issues, which prompted the South China Morning Post to proclaim that “China’s place at the centre of global bitcoin mining is fading.” 

“We are seeing the cryptocurrency market enter a path to ‘de-China-isation’ — first on trading and now on computing power, based on a series of stronger steps taken against cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin mining last week by Beijing,” Wang Juan, affiliate professor on blockchain at Xi’an Jiaotong University and a member of the OECD Blockchain Expert Policy Advisory Board, advised the publication.

But perhaps not. Darin Feinstein, founder and government chairman at Blockcap — considered one of the largest crypto miners in North America — isn’t completely satisfied that Bitcoin mining is completed in China, the world’s present mining heart. In 2017, China made an analogous announcement, he advised Cointelegraph, additional explaining:

“After that announcement, another company I founded, Core Scientific, entered into multiple contracts with Chinese miners to help them relocate some percentage of their miners back to the United States. None of those deals ever came to fruition, and all those miners continued to mine in China to this day.”

Still, three mining companies — BTC.TOP, Huobi and HashCow — introduced they have been closing shop on the mainland, whereas China skilled Bill Bishop reported in his publication “Sinocism” that the eight authorities draft measures taken towards mining actions in the Inner Mongolia area have been “harsh,” and “it is going to be much harder to think that this is just a passing crackdown and that things will return to normal relatively soon.” Other provinces and areas, together with Sichuan and Xinjiang, may comply with swimsuit.

No one may be sure what goes on behind the curtain in China, as Feinstein notes, but it surely’s value asking: What is the actual impetus behind the newest (obvious) crypto mining clampdown, and why now?

Is it purely to thrust back monetary dangers, as the state introduced, or may one thing else may be concerned, together with vitality/environmental issues? Will China-based mining companies now move offshore, and in that case, the place may new crypto mining facilities come up?

Finally, is that this one other sign that energy-intensive proof-of-work validation protocols, the kind utilized by Bitcoin and different cryptocurrencies, are more and more problematic in an ecologically anxious world?

A menace to “old systems?”

“Control over monetary policy and financial systems is important for a central government, and Bitcoin is a threat to that,” Ethan Vera, chief working officer of Luxor Tech, advised Cointelegraph in reference to the new mining restrictions, including, “Bitcoin is clearly cementing its place in the world and proving itself as a valuable store of value for people globally. This threatens the old systems.”

Yu Xiong, affiliate dean worldwide at Surrey University and chair of enterprise analytics at Surrey Business School, cites environmental issues as the primary purpose for the crackdown. Countries like China, which have declared they need to turn out to be “carbon neutral” in some unspecified time in the future in time — 2060 in the case of China — are actually feeling rising stress “to stay away from emissions-intensive sectors.” Bitcoin mining is one sector that may be simply sacrificed “without too much cost at the national level,” Xiong advised Cointelegraph.

Why now? “Bitcoin grew too fast recently and has impacted many investors’ behavior,” stated Xiong, including, “Governments normally want to see a sector grow reasonably rather than radically — so some action had to be taken.”

It may not essentially be the finish of mining on the mainland, nevertheless, in Xiong’s view. The sector may emerge later as a regulated business. To put issues in financial phrases, “they already earned money in this round, so now they cash out, wait for the price to go down, then join again,” in line with him.

“It is too early to tell the actual effects of the vice premier’s comments,” stated Vera, including, “We have seen a couple hundred megawatts of power requests cross our desk this week.” He additional defined:

“Miners based in Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang have reached out to international providers to try to get their mining equipment out immediately. Some miners in Sichuan have begun looking to move some of their operations overseas to diversify geopolitical risk.”

Are environmental issues legitimate?

Vera urged that ecological issues about the vitality utilization and carbon footprint of crypto mining could also be one thing of a “scapegoat,” whereas Feinstein opined that the environmental query had some nuances. For occasion, in the Sichuan area, “the majority of power is renewable, sourced from a large collection of hydroelectric plants running renewable energy. Those plants have massive excess energy during the Chinese rainy season,” with electrical energy prices near zero.

Elsewhere, although, China makes use of huge quantities of coal, Feinstein continued. “I would assume that to meet their internal climate goals, the coal regions will face pressure to close,” whereas miners positioned the place renewable vitality sources are prevalent could face fewer restrictions. “But we have yet to see a comprehensive document come out, so it’s pure conjecture at this point.”

Winston Ma, adjunct professor at New York University School of Law and writer of The Digital War: How China’s Tech Power Shapes the Future of AI, Blockchain and Cyberspace, advised Cointelegraph that environmental issues have been, certainly, a big consider the clampdown, and whereas hydropower — as utilized in the Sichuan area — is taken into account as clear vitality, “the Chinese government has pledged to meet energy efficiency targets, which could still limit the expansion of high energy-consuming industries like crypto mining,” including:

“Yes, carbon neutrality is a major consideration. […] Recent research by Chinese scientists noted that this emission output in China [from crypto mining] would exceed the total annualized greenhouse gas emission output of some smaller countries, such as the Czech Republic and Qatar.”

Feinstein, nevertheless, disputes the carbon footprint and vitality consumption arguments — insisting they lack context. “The total energy produced in the world is 160,000 terawatts per hour of energy. This is all energy from every source. The Bitcoin network uses 120 TWh of that energy. That means, simply, that the Bitcoin network uses .00075 of available energy in the world,” or lower than one-tenth of 1%.

Similarly, the carbon launched “as a result of the energy used in plugging the machines into the grid power” can be lower than 0.1%, and that quantity drops sharply as extra mining rigs swap to renewable vitality sources. Feinstein added:

“There are industries that are criminally responsible for destroying our environment and ecosystem, but this is not one of them.”

Could North America choose up the slack?

If China is certainly down-throttling crypto mining, will North America change it as mining’s regional heart — as some have been suggesting even earlier than the new restrictions? Who else may revenue?

According to the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance, Bitcoin at the moment consumes round 110 terawatts per hour per yr, whereas Ethereum provides one other 44.5 — according to Digiconomist — and this doesn’t even embody different PoW cryptos, so if a good portion of that will get shut down in China, it must discover a new residence. Says Vera:

“North America is primed in the mid-term to take a lion’s share of that power requirement but will not have the ability to take it all immediately. We expect significant growth in South America, the Commonwealth of Independent States region [e.g., Kazakhstan], and Northern Europe.”

“If the Chinese miners are nervous about future policies, they will slow down on new equipment purchases,” stated Feinstein, “and those equipment purchasers will go to the next-best customers, which I believe are in the United States. So, we should see United States mining companies increasing hash rate.”

But there are potential hindrances right here, together with the lack of infrastructure corporations to produce the electrical energy wanted to energy the computer systems that validate crypto’s block transactions. “In terms of plugging those machines in, you need to have […] companies building enough infrastructure at a pace to accommodate those miners. Currently, the demand to plug in miners exceeds the available infrastructure,” Feinstein stated.

Related: North American crypto miners prepare to challenge China’s dominance, Cointelegraph Magazine

“Kazakhstan and Canada are regions that Chinese miners are talking about these days for potential relocation,” provides Ma. But relocating might not be so simple as it sounds. “Chinese miners may have to deal with unfamiliar partners, unstable power supplies and unexpected new compliance costs. Adding on the relocation costs, probably only the biggest and most resourceful mining operators can make the exodus smoothly.”

It’s necessary to notice that each one of the giant Bitcoin ASIC producers are positioned in China, Thomas Heller, co-founder and chief enterprise officer of Bitcoin mining service supplier Compass Mining, advised Cointelegraph. Bitmain, MicroBT and Canaan are the solely three corporations with new-gen Bitcoin ASICs. Heller said additional:

“If the Chinese government cracked down on the ASIC manufacturers, then there would be a huge impact on the mining industry. Currently, Bitmain has a factory in Malaysia, and MicroBT has been exploring setting up a factory in Southeast Asia, and I would expect these companies to ramp up efforts overseas.”

Elsewhere, “Russia and Kazakhstan are preferred for shifting large quantities of old-generation miners due to lower power prices,” added Heller, “while North America is more suitable for new-gen units. The challenge right now in North America is a severe shortage of rack space for hosting miners.”

Taking the longer view, what does all this rivalry say about Bitcoin — and different cryptocurrencies that use energy-gobbling validation protocols? Is this a sustainable sector over the long term? “While we don’t believe the crackdown in China has to do with the environment, we do think it’s a pressing issue in North America,” answered Vera, including additional:

“Western miners that are accessing capital markets for expansion must push towards renewable energy or carbon-neutral methods of mining in order to attract capital. Publicly listed mining companies are the first companies in the spotlight and must react as we saw with Greenidge purchasing carbon offsets and Marathon pivoting to Compute North from their Hardin site.”

Bitcoin can proceed to develop, particularly if all its mining swimming pools move to renewable vitality, Xiong advised Cointelegraph. Indeed, the sector has the alternative to be a shining instance to different industries — i.e., “the first sector that achieves Zero Carbon.”

Elsewhere, Xiong wrote that “regulations and rules should be enacted as soon as possible to standardise bitcoin’s coin mining behaviour, and explicitly require that only renewable energy sources such as solar energy and hydrogen energy can be used for cryptocurrency mining.”

Is there nonetheless a long-term function for China?

All in all, have the latest occasions marked the starting of the finish of Chinese crypto mining dominance — estimated to be as excessive as 80% of the world’s capability — although some put it decrease?

“In the long term, nearly all of Chinese crypto mining rigs will be sold overseas, as Chinese regulators crack down on mining at home,” wrote BTC.TOP founder Jiang Zhuoer in a weblog put up, as reported by Reuters. “China will lose crypto computing power to foreign markets,” together with European and United States mining swimming pools.

Related: Carbon-neutral Bitcoin funds gain traction as investors seek greener crypto

Reflecting on the comparable mining clampdown announcement by China in 2017, Feinstein advised Cointelegraph: “I would predict a similar result this time. These miners will be mining in 2024 when we can expect another similar announcement. We will see certain countries banning Bitcoin and mining over and over again forever. If it was possible for a country to completely ban Bitcoin or Bitcoin mining, it would only happen once.”

But perhaps the paradigm actually has shifted. “We still believe that China will play a role in mining in the long term,” said Vera. “But this event has fundamentally changed the way Chinese miners perceive domestic risk and will encourage international expansion.”