SHANGHAI: Last month, the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee formally backed the Strategic Competition Act of 2021, which labels China a strategic competitor in plenty of areas, together with commerce, expertise and safety.
Given bipartisan help – exceedingly uncommon within the United States these days – Congress will almost certainly cross the invoice, and President Joe Biden will signal it. With that, America’s antagonism towards China would successfully grow to be enshrined in US regulation.
The Strategic Competition Act purports to focus on supposed “malign behaviours” during which China engages to realize an “unfair economic advantage” and the “deference” of different nations to “its political and strategic objectives”.
In reality, the invoice says much more in regards to the US itself – little of it flattering – than it does about China.
- READ: Commentary: The US needs a new China strategy
- READ: Commentary: Did Hong Kong just sever ties with Taiwan?
- READ: Commentary: On China, Biden risks being boxed in by his predecessor’s combative approach
- READ: Commentary: Cooperation between US, China at global climate summit could yield significant benefits
- READ: Commentary: To its own detriment, the US still doesn’t understand China
- READ: Commentary: How to prevent ‘Trump 2024’ from happening
- READ: Commentary: We need to talk about how Donald Trump’s presidency wasn’t a complete disaster
- READ: Commentary: After Alaska, age of selective engagement in US-China relations begins
The US used to take a sanguine view of China’s financial improvement, recognising the profitable alternatives that it represented. Even after China’s emergence as a political and financial powerhouse, successive US administrations typically regarded China as a strategic accomplice, quite than a competitor.
But, in the previous few years, the view of China as a strategic rival has taken over the American political mainstream, with leaders largely selecting confrontation over cooperation.
Two options of this shift stand out: How shortly it occurred, and the extent to which Americans – and their leaders – have united behind it.
EXTREME POLARISATION IN THE US
Ironically, the issue is partly rooted in excessive ideological polarisation, which has impeded US political leaders’ potential to manipulate successfully and minimise the social prices of structural transformation within the age of globalisation and digitalisation.
These failures fuelled common frustration and social tensions, creating fertile floor for former President Donald Trump’s populist America First marketing campaign.
Vilification of China – which, not like the US, prudently managed the dangers of financial globalisation to minimise the prices of structural change – was central to Trump’s electoral attraction. It can be maybe essentially the most notable characteristic of the Trump doctrine to have survived the transition to Joe Biden’s administration.
The anti-China narrative has thus restored some frequent floor to American politics. Unfortunately, Americans are agreeing on an concept that can do them much more hurt than good.
What the US ought to be focusing on is profit from globalisation and technological progress and handle the dangers arising from the related structural disruptions.
To that finish, efficient cooperation with China – along with a broader embrace of free commerce and financial openness – can be enormously useful.
READ: Commentary: Cooperation between US, China at global climate summit could yield significant benefits
In reality, based on former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who spoke at a particular session of the China Development Forum in Beijing in March, a optimistic, cooperative bilateral relationship is important to international peace and prosperity.
And no American alive at present is best certified to evaluate Sino-American relations than Kissinger, whose secret mission to Beijing 50 years in the past this yr led to the restoration of diplomatic ties.
In his remarks, Kissinger acknowledged simply how troublesome will probably be to construct the Sino-American relationship the world wants, noting that the completely different cultures and histories of those two “great societies” naturally result in variations of opinion.
Modern expertise, international communications and financial globalisation additional complicate the flexibility to achieve consensus.
FRAGMENTED MEDIA LANDSCAPE
Kissinger was proper to focus on trendy expertise as a key problem. In the previous, when dominant media organisations largely formed the favored narrative, remaining comparatively impartial was the best solution to compete.
With voters all sharing roughly the identical info, politicians’ greatest guess was to attraction to the “median voter”, quite than these on the extremes. As Anthony Downs defined together with his “median voter theorem” – impressed by the Hotelling mannequin in economics – the end result of majority voting is the median voter’s most popular possibility.
But trendy expertise has fragmented the media panorama and eroded conventional information organisations’ “gatekeeper” position. Inaccurate, deceptive or in any other case unreliable information can be disseminated to an enormous viewers immediately.
Moreover, it can be focused at those that are almost certainly to agree with it, and evaded those that would disagree.
This has fuelled a rising choice for “personalised” information – and remodeled media’s aggressive methods. In this atmosphere, impartial reporting doesn’t appeal to as a lot consideration as inflammatory or ideologically pushed reporting, particularly if the latter is algorithmically focused at those that are primed to embrace it.
The media’s position in establishing a typical factual foundation has thus more and more passed by the wayside – and, with it, the technique of interesting to the median voter.
As US media embraced more and more biased, focused methods, deep polarisation grew to become all however inevitable.
This, along with US politicians’ new incentives to attraction to the ideological extremes, has torn on the material of American society, fuelling instability and battle, hampering leaders’ potential to deal with pressing challenges, and undermining America’s place of worldwide management.
China has largely averted this pitfall of recent expertise, although not with out price and criticism, by controlling excessive online speech and limiting populist assaults on mainstream values.
But it has not averted America’s media-fuelled ire. In a matter of only a few years, the US-China relationship has regressed considerably, and the worldwide free commerce system has been pushed to the brink of collapse.
As Kissinger made clear, the problem of restoring Sino-American relations shouldn’t deter leaders from making an attempt.
On the opposite, it calls for that either side make “ever more intensive efforts” to work collectively. For the US, nonetheless, that work should start at residence. The actual risk to the US isn’t from rising China, however from its incapability to satisfy the challenges of recent expertise.
Zhang Jun is Dean of the School of Economics at Fudan University and Director of the China Center for Economic Studies, a Shanghai-based suppose tank.