Analysis Proves SARS-CoV-2 Lab Origin

Dr. Mercola Interviews the Experts

This article is a part of a weekly collection by which Dr. Mercola interviews numerous consultants on quite a lot of well being points. To see extra professional interviews, click on here.

In this interview, Dr. Steven Quay — one of many most-cited scientists on the earth1 — discusses his Bayesian evaluation,2 printed January 29, 2021, which concludes past a doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is laboratory derived. Quay is an M.D. with a Ph.D. in chemistry. You can study extra about Dr. Quay on his website.

He did his medical residency at Mass General at Harvard Hospital and his postdoctoral work at MIT with a Noble laureate. He holds 87 patents in 22 fields of drugs, together with the gadolinium used with MRI imaging.

During his profession, Quay printed 360 papers, which have been cited over 10,000 occasions. His COVID origin paper, nonetheless, has already been downloaded 170,000 occasions. Bayesian evaluation,3 or Bayesian inference, is a statistical software used to reply questions on unknown parameters by utilizing chance distributions for observable knowledge.

Quay’s extremely conservatively-skewed evaluation reveals there’s solely a 0.2% probability that this virus got here from nature, and a 99.8% chance that it got here from a lab. His 140-page paper could be downloaded from zenodo.org4 for individuals who need to dive into the nitty gritty of this statistical evaluation. He offered these knowledge to House Representatives throughout a June 26, 2021, subcommittee on the coronavirus disaster assembly.5

Instead of utilizing the noticed statistics of the information he gathered, he radically lowered the chance to 1 in 20. When one combines all of the statistical anomalies from the 26 totally different knowledge factors he collected, the actual probability of the virus coming from nature is lower than 1 in all of the atoms of the universe — 1080 — which is a really, very giant quantity, making it nearly unattainable.

SARS-CoV-2 Has a Protein Sequence Found in Bee Venom Toxin

As early as January 2020, Quay knew SARS-CoV-2 could possibly be problematic. 

“Nobody was paying any attention because there was no need to at that point,” he says. “I noticed this virus popping out of China. I appeared on the sequence of it and I keep in mind telling my spouse, ‘I do know what this factor goes to do in cells,’ as a result of for 5 years at Stanford, I used to be learning and was the world professional on the toxin melittin, which is a bee venom toxin, the factor that hurts once you get a bee venom …

This melittin, this toxin in bee venom, has the identical sequence that SARS-CoV-2 had … I run a public firm, so I went to the board a pair weeks later and mentioned, ‘Look, I feel we will provide you with some therapeutics and a few concepts round this.’ We truly are in scientific trials with some merchandise for therapeutics in opposition to SARS-CoV-2.

Then I began listening to some actually loopy public well being advisories round masks, social distancing and issues, so I ended up writing a bit of e book that was a No. 1 finest vendor for just a few weeks referred to as ‘Stay Safe: [A Physician’s Guide to Survive Coronavirus,]’ on Amazon. That took me by the summer time. Then I began going again to one thing. I used to be very involved about what I noticed as properties of this virus that had by no means been seen earlier than.

It’s now public data that the federal government recognized one among my papers, so I used to be contacted by the State Department within the fall and principally was an adviser to their packages there, together with a three-hour deep dive from all the totally different committees or businesses there …

I proceed to push this as a result of … if it got here from nature, there are particular issues we should always do in another way to not have this occur once more. If it got here from a laboratory, there is a fully totally different set of issues you might want to do. It’s not a blame sport.”

There Are Several Ways to Make a Virus More Dangerous

Quay lately printed one other paper by which he reveals that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) can also be engaged on one other virus, the Nipah virus, which has a 90% lethality charge. It does not take a genius to determine what would possibly occur if a virus with that lethality bought out. Quay explains:

“[The WIV] published an early paper on samples from COVID patients in the hospital … It’s the most-read paper from the beginning of the pandemic. I did a deep dive into their raw data. The sequence is 30,000 nucleotides — the raw data’s 55 million nucleotides. What you can see in there is a fingerprint of everything they’ve been doing for the last two years. They’re doing a lot of crazy research.”

As defined by Quay, the WIV has been round for about 40 years. In 2003, after SARS-Cov-1 emerged, the U.S. and France helped China refurbish the WIV right into a safer BSL 4 biolab, the one one in China. Since then, the WIV has grow to be a major laboratory for zoonotic viruses. It’s additionally one of many prime three laboratories for gain-of-function artificial biology, which could be completed in a number of methods.

If what you need to alter, you’ll be able to insert a brand new artificial amino acid into the pathogen. If you do not have a exact concept of the change you need to obtain, however you need the pathogen to adapt from an animal to a human, you are able to do what known as serial passage, the place the virus is handed by a collection of animal and human tissues. 

For instance, you could possibly begin by infecting 20 humanized mice with a virus, then isolate the virus from the sickest mouse and provides it to a different 20. Humanized mice are genetically modified mice to have human lung tissue. After 4 or 5 passages like that, the virus may have mutated to assault and kill human hosts.

“The third means is to drop large chunks of fabric in there. For instance, the a part of the virus of SARS-CoV-2 that interacts with the cell is about 200 amino acids, so occasions three for nucleic acid, in order that’s 600. You can simply drop an enormous piece of 600 in and immediately go from an animal to people, or no matter route you need.

So, these are the three [primary strategies]: Knowing what to do with single spots, randomly letting nature do it in serial passage, after which dropping large chunks in.”

The Bayesian Theorem

As talked about, Bayesian evaluation is a statistical software utilizing chance distributions. The theorem was developed by Thomas Bayes, a seventeenth century Presbyterian minister and statistician-mathematician who printed many papers throughout his lifetime. After his demise, his property found personal notes detailing a course of for understanding giant advanced occasions in a easy simple vogue. The Bayesian equation is A multiplied by B, divided by C. Quay explains:

“It’s precisely the identical factor we do when we now have a favourite baseball crew and we watch it through the season. Before the season, we all know what they did final yr. We know who the brand new gamers are, the brand new coaches, all these issues, and we provide you with what we name a previous prediction.

We rank the groups in keeping with what we predict will occur on the World Series, and that is what’s referred to as our prior, our posterior possibilities. Then the season occurs and also you begin profitable video games, shedding video games, folks get injured, new gamers, transfers, and also you replace that each week.

At the beginning of the World Series, you are most likely fairly removed from the place you had been initially of the season, since you’re now down to 2 groups however, nonetheless, you continue to do not know the ultimate evaluation. One of the caveats for this 140-page work is, on the finish, though I say there is a 1 in 500 probability it got here from nature, however meaning … 499 occasions out of 500 it got here from a laboratory.”

Bayesian Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Origin

With regard to SARS-CoV-2, “A” can be the prior estimate of the probability of it coming from a lab or from nature. “B” is the brand new proof, the brand new chance that it got here from a lab, and “C” is the chance that it got here from nature. When you multiply A and B and divide it by C, you get a brand new A first-rate, a single chance. However, as new knowledge accumulate, the reply modifications.

“The very first thing I did was assume the prior probability it got here from nature or a lab, understanding nothing, principally. That needs to be your start line. Three papers knowledgeable that. One paper says that eight occasions a yr, there is a pure soar from nature to a human.

Another paper mentioned, every year, there is a lab leak in Asia, so 8-to-1 [in favor of natural origin]. That’s like 85% chance [that it came] from nature. I used three papers, and my start line was a 98% chance it got here from nature, understanding nothing else.”

Quay didn’t embody the three papers mainstream media and reality checkers have leaned on to debunk the lab origin theory, and in his paper he explains why they had been excluded. In quick, they relied on hypothesis and never science, so the clear bias and lack of scientific details made them too unreliable.

Next, he entered 26 totally different items of proof into the equation. The first piece of information was the truth that the virus first emerged in Wuhan, China, which has by no means occurred earlier than. Wuhan has a inhabitants of 11 million folks. It’s a really city space with little man-nature contact. Wuhan additionally has one among solely three biosafety stage (BSL) 4 laboratories on the earth which might be conducting coronavirus analysis particularly. Next, he calculated possibilities.

“You know the realm of China; the inhabitants of China. If the virus occurred randomly, what’s the probability it might occur in Wuhan? If there is a laboratory in Wuhan, what are the probabilities it might have escaped elsewhere in China and never appeared in Wuhan?

You do the flip. If it got here from nature, why did it find yourself in Wuhan? If it got here from Wuhan, what’s the chance it might have first appeared elsewhere in China? That hits your possibilities fairly exhausting out of the field. That was merchandise No. 1. Then you simply work by the others.”

Zoonotic Transmission

One key piece that makes an enormous distinction on this Bayesian calculation is the query of zoonosis. In order for zoonosis to use, you have to have an animal with a spine (vertebrae) that’s contaminated with a microbe. Malaria, for instance, is just not a zoonotic illness, as a result of mosquitoes don’t have vertebrae. Malaria is a vector-transmitted illness.

The key to discovering the origin of a zoonotic transmission is to find the animal. If the animal is locally, then zoonotic transmission happens by a pure course of. If the transmission happens in a lab, then it is a laboratory-acquired an infection, not a zoonotic transmission. Early on, we had been advised as much as 70% of the earliest COVID sufferers had visited a number of markets in Wuhan, a few of which have dwell animals on the market.

The downside is SARS-CoV-2 was not present in any of the greater than 1,000 animal specimens collected from these markets. They additionally sampled greater than 1,000 items of frozen meals imported from exterior of China, all of which got here again clear. About 15% of environmental samples, nonetheless, did have the virus.

They additionally collected samples from all the opposite markets throughout the Hubei Province, the place Wuhan is positioned. No virus. About 1,000 bats in Hubei had been examined, and no virus was discovered. Over 80,000 animals representing 209 species from each province of China had been finally examined, and no SARS-CoV-2 was discovered.

For comparability, SARS-1 was present in 85% of animals examined. The unique host was recognized because the civet cat. MERS, which got here from the Middle East, originated in a bat that had jumped to a camel earlier than turning right into a human virus, and it was present in 90% of animals. Yet, after the biggest surveillance ever carried out within the historical past of the world, having examined 80,000 animal specimens, not one has been discovered to hold SARS-CoV-2.

“In my Bayesian analysis … even though I should drop 80,000 into the denominator of my equation, what I did was I degraded it to the standard in clinical trials of biology to a P of .05. I said, ‘Despite the fact that zero out of 80,000 had this [virus], I’m going to treat this as if it’s a 1 in 20 event,’ because that’s the only way I could keep doing the analysis. Otherwise, I was done at the get-go,” Quay explains.

To be clear, this provides a really unfair benefit to the zoonotic origin principle, however Quay wished to have an entire evaluation of all of the parameters. Diversity is a trademark of nature, but there is not any range in nature for this virus. Zoonotic proponents have argued that the virus have to be present in excessive focus in an intermediate species, but not one out of 80,000 samples from 209 totally different animal species is a provider of the virus.

No Animal Reservoir or Intermediate Host Has Been Found

Another key piece of the evaluation is the virus itself. Bats are nature’s reservoirs for coronaviruses. The bats are by no means sickened by them, so the virus isn’t rooted out. It simply lives within the bats for many years, mutating and recombining with different viruses alongside the best way. Bat-to-human contact may be very uncommon, so more often than not, the switch happens between the bats, the reservoir host and an intermediate host earlier than it enters the human inhabitants.

That’s what occurred with SARS-1 and MERS. Early circumstances of SARS-1 and MERS had been divided evenly between human to human transmission, and transmissions that occurred between totally different animals and people. This means each of those viruses had been almost certainly zoonotic in origin.

As talked about earlier, Quay cites analysis displaying pure jumps from nature to a human happen eight occasions a yr, and lab escapes happen every year. That offers us an 8-to-1 probability of zoonotic origin. However, of the primary 259 circumstances in China, not one was traced again to animal contact. All had been human-to-human transmissions.

As famous by Quay, “This is the equivalent of going to Las Vegas and flipping a coin and getting heads 259 times. When you ask your statistician to do that, it’s a P value with 84 zeros and a number, so again, that’s absolutely impossible.”

To perceive how large this quantity is, the estimated variety of atoms within the universe is 10 to the eightieth energy. Despite this displaying it is kind of unattainable for SARS-CoV-2 to have a zoonotic origin, Quay gave this a P worth of simply 0.5 (or a 1 in 20 probability) — once more, simply to maintain the evaluation going.

“It’s not in the animals in nature. The virus is a pure virus … It hit the ground with one sequence, and it makes a mistake every two weeks randomly and if it’s the kind of mistake it really likes, it keeps it and then that one takes off,” he says.

“Again, SARS-1, MERS, each different zoonosis, when it jumps into people, it is a two-step course of. Initially, it jumps into people, however it does not have all of the issues it wants. It cannot make very many child viruses, et cetera, and so it burns out, after which it tries once more, and it tries once more. It jumps again to camels, that type of factor.

Eventually, it will get all of the mutations it must assist human to human switch. Then you’ve the inspiration for an epidemic, however that is a protracted course of. With SARS-1 it took a yr and a half. With MERS, it took two and a half years in camels earlier than it bought there. What does that imply although? Every time a human will get an an infection … there’s a file of their blood. They make antibodies to the virus.

Once {that a} zoonosis goes to leap into people and depart a file within the hospital specimens and you’ve got a check from the epidemic of the virus itself, you’ll be able to return into the hospital and discover specimens. Typically, it might vary from 1, to 4, to 7, to virtually 20% of the specimens.

For instance, folks working available in the market may have antibody proof that they’d the an infection, whether or not they knew it or not.

This is a really highly effective software … Because of the distinctive functionality of this virus to hit human to human transmission from the get-go, [Kristian Andersen, a virologist at the Scripps Research Institute in California who published a paper6 supporting zoonotic origin] predicted that there can be numerous pre-epidemic seroconversion.

These are fancy phrases for ‘go right into a hospital, take samples out of the fridge, check them and discover a excessive share.’ Of course, folks took him up on that and examined over 9,900 banked specimens from December [2020] and earlier than in Wuhan. How many do you assume they discovered that had been constructive?

My statistician says they need to have had 100 to 400. They bought zero. You run the crank on that, and that is a 1 in one million chance.

The virus has the unbelievable functionality of being essentially the most aggressive human to human virus that is ever been seen within the historical past of virology, however it doesn’t have the hallmark of how you’ll construct that in nature, which is pre-epidemic human contact. You cannot have each of those properties in the identical virus if it got here from nature.

Now, in case you take a mouse that is been humanized in a laboratory to have human lungs and also you serial passage there, that’s an efficient technique to do it.

Amazingly, two months after the epidemic broke out, we’re February-March 2020 now, Dr. Shi on the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Dr. Baric in America, the No. 1 artificial biologist on the earth of coronavirus analysis in North Carolina, printed a paper saying, ‘Hey, in case you develop this virus in transgenic mice, it kills the mice and, by the best way, they get mind infections, which is de facto uncommon.’

I’m saying, ‘Yeah, that is most likely the experiment that was executed in 2019 that led to the spill.'” 

Again, utilizing extraordinarily conservative knowledge, Quay’s evaluation reveals there is a 99.8% chance that SARS-CoV-2 is a laboratory creation. If you need to learn by all of it, his paper could be downloaded from

Odd SARS-CoV-2 Proteins Suppress Your Immune Function

At the tip of the interview, Quay delivers one more bombshell. SARS-CoV-2 makes three major sorts of proteins. The first are the structural proteins for a virus — the spike, envelope and nucleoplasm proteins. It additionally makes proteins that take over the cells’ manufacturing course of, thereby permitting the virus to copy contained in the cell. In addition to these, it additionally makes two very odd proteins which might be excreted into your blood.

“These strange proteins, they’re not the virus, they’re not in the cell,” Quay explains. “When you get an infection, you get a fever, you get sweaty and you get chills, you feel like crap. That’s not the virus. That’s your own interferon signaling and it helps you fight the virus and probably in prehistory it told your fellow tribe members to isolate you in your own tent. So, it evolved as a social signal for survival of the tribe.”


Source Link –

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

20 − nineteen =

Back to top button